On a more serious note and still on the gov Okorocha’s deportation of 84 youths of Hausa origin, Katsina state from our state, Imo as reported by Vanguard Newspaper of 28 January, 2014 edition, ever since I posted it and my recent condemnation of that very unlawful act, so many people had since gotten my postulations misconstrued as they had alleged me of double standard and speaking from the both sides of my mouth!
May I at this juncture correct some misconceived impressions emanating from the camps of the governor!
I am stating that: 1. I condemns the repatriation of bornifide Nigerians from a Nigerian state because it is illegal and unconstitutional as the constitution clearly guarantees the right of every Nigerian to live at any location in Nigeria, and hence, it is an infringement on the rights of the Katsina cum Nigerian youths .
2. I have never in any way supported the illegal acts of the governor but only supported and commended the proactive responsiveness of the Imo state police command in ascertaining if truly the suspects are true Boko harams as alleged because it is within the prerogative of the police to prosecute if they finds them to be true Boko haram and not the duty of the governor to repatriate anybody even if they were found guilty after the holistic investigations and other necessary procedures, as Nigerians, they were not meant to be deported from a Nigerian state but will serve whatever jail term in Imo state and not the other way round of deportation as gov Okorocha did.
3.for the governor to hastily repatriate the suspects back to their states of origin from Imo state spells out that there is some thing more in the offing. Why didn’t the governor allowed the security apparatus to carry out their investigation to ascertain if truly these youths are Boko haram as alleged? Our governor by deporting these youths from Imo state without investigation from the security officials means that he is hiding some thing from us and some how, the allegations that the youths were imported because of 2015 election might be true and on this note, am calling on our governor to allow the security officials to do their work without his interference and after if there’s nothing to it, our governor can then charge the Imo state PDP for raising a false alarm and until then, we demand that he allows the police to do their works.
This issue of the gov. Rochas Okorocha to hurriedly deporting the youths raises some genuine questions from discerning Imolites and the general public, because it would be very important to know if they were deported back home for their own safety or is it because of the fear that they might wreck havocs in the state? As Imo state government through ICAPS had claimed that these ones repatriated were in training and it brings in yet another question, Who recruited them for the training? Under what arrangement did they come?. These are few out of the many pertinent questions in the lips of Ndi-Imo begging for answers. I am against every move to forcefully move a Nigerian away from his/her place of residence or a place of schooling to his/her state of origin.
What if the Imo state PDP hadn’t had raised an alarm over the in flocks of suspected Boko-haram members into Imo state, would the governor had left the suspected boko-haram members? And what was the actual crime of the Katsina youths? By repatriating them back to their state is not only witty, but also very suspicious and our governor must come out and clear all these genuine suspicion out of Imolites and also produce the remaining members of the suspected boko haram members as the Imo state PDP had claimed in their allegation that they were more than 600 and gov Rochas only provided 84 people, where are then the remaining people? As the governor has started fetching them out, let him provide them all and hand them over to the law enforcement agencies this time and not deporting them back to their state because we the Imolites wants to know who imported them in the first place and for what reason/s they were imported.
Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
OWERRI — For fears that they might be members of the dreaded Boko Haram, Imo State government, weekend, sent back to Katsina about 84 persons.
The deportees, mainly youths, had been in Imo State for eight days under-going skill acquisition training when the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in the state raised an alarm that they might be Boko Haram insurgents.
The young Muslims, who had spent about eight days in the state, were quartered in the premises of Imo Newspapers Limited, on Egbu Road, Owerri, which is now renamed “Imo College of Advanced Professional Studies, ICAPS.”
A security man on guard in the premises, who spoke on strict grounds of anonymity, explained that government had no other option than to send them safely back home.
“The alarm by PDP raised palpable fears that people could descend on the innocent students. Government had to cut short their training and sent them back to their state,” the man said.
Speaking to inquisitive journalists in Owerri, the Director General of ICAPS, Mr. David Day, confirmed that the establishment trained youths on skills and leadership programmes.
“We do not train miscreants, criminals and members of Boko Haram in ICAPS. We had to cut short the training of 84 literate youths from Katsina State, as a result of the alarm, which obviously put their lives in danger,” Mr. Day said.
Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
It’s funny watching the contrail that goes up in the sky when 99% of the people are wrong.
From the reaction to the anti-gay marriage bill passed by the senate, it is safe, the Nigerian way, to say that 99% of Nigerians are in support of it. (By the way, one way of knowing that you are a Nigerian is if you take delight in throwing abstract figures around.)
I have no problem with the large number of Nigerians who support the bill. I do not begrudge them either. Unlike those pissed off by the multitude of people in support, I actually understood why.
But that does not make the bill right.
I wouldn’t have bothered to squeeze myself into a debate that has no space for rational thinking if I had not read a pedestrian editorial on the bill by the Guardian newspaper of Nigeria. When the so-called Nigeria’s flagship newspaper shows no interest in expanding and elevating the discourse, it troubles me.
To begin with, I can bet anyone N10,000 that President Goodluck Jonathan will not sign the bill. No president of a dependent country like Nigeria will sign such a bill and survive in today’s world. So, on that basis, opponents of the bill can relax. It is dead on arrival at the president’s desk. Unless (and that is a big unless) the president can trade signing the bill with quelling the crises that will follow the removal of oil subsidy.
Having said that, it is important to point out the fallacies that emerged in discussions surrounding the bill. Those are more troubling to me than the bill itself.
To begin with, I did not know that gays in Nigeria were planning to get married. The chief sponsor of the bill, Senator Domingo Obende said that, “Same sex marriage is spreading and spreading around the whole world just like pornography and terrorism which will become the order of the day if not arrested on time.” I wish he and his colleagues in the senate can apply such foresight in dealing with real threats already devastating Nigeria.
The first fallacy I want us to discard is the idea that homosexuality is not African culture but part of Western culture. Little research (wink wink- google search) will show anyone that the West reacted exactly the same way Africans are reacting today when homosexuality first became pronounced in their society.
In 1779, the liberal Thomas Jefferson, who insisted in the separation of Church and State, proposed a law calling for the castration of gays. Jefferson’s law was considered an improvement from the predominant law in the books then that called for death.
In 1895, one of the greatest Irish writers, Oscar Wilde, was arrested and jailed for engaging in homosexual activities. He died soon after he served his sentence.
The first national gay rights movement in America, the Mattachine Society, was founded in 1951.
In 1961, sodomy law was repealed in Illinois. Connecticut followed in 1969. Meanwhile other states continued to sentence those caught in consensual gay sex to prison for up to 20 years.
In June of 1969, riot broke out after New York City police stormed Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Greenwich Village. After three days of riots during which over 2000 people came out in support of lesbians, gays and transgender, the gay rights movement officially kicked off. Since then, every June, cities across America hold gay pride parade.
In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association, which once classified homosexuality as a mental illness, recanted and came out in defense of homosexuality.
On November 27, 1978, Harvey Milk, an openly gay San Francisco Supervisor was assassinated.
At the 1980 Democratic National Convention, the Democratic Party inserted in its platform a “protection of all groups from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.”
In 1982, the General Synod of the Church of England voted to refuse to condemn homosexuality.
In 1993, Hawaii Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage. The Hawaii state lawmakers immediately amended the state constitution to overrule the court. In 1996, President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act that was aimed at stopping gay marriage approved by any state from being enforceable in other states.
In Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Yemen, the punishment for homosexual activity is death. Since 1979, Iran has executed over 4000 people for committing homosexual acts. Despite the killings, gays still exist in Iran. More importantly, Iran has not been transformed into a model society where anti-gay men and women around the world can call home.
In 1998, Mathew Wayne Sheppard, a student of the University of Wyoming was murdered because he was gay.
Many Nigerians do not know that it was only in 2003 that the US Supreme Court ended a law that made it a crime for same-sex couple to have intercourse.
In July of this year, Peter Lucas Moses, a 27-year old leader of the Black Hebrew Israelites, shot and killed a 4year-old son of his girlfriend in North Carolina. His reason was that he thought the boy was gay because he slapped another boy’s behind.
According to polls, in 1996, when the Defense of Marriage Act was passed, only 25% of the American public supported same-sex marriage. By 2011, Gallop, CNN, ABC News/Washington Post polls all noted that majority of Americans approve same-sex marriage.
In America today, majority of those who oppose same-sax marriage are older Americans, those who attend religious services, members of the Republican Party and Americans who call the South and the Midwest home. Another block in opposition is African-Americans, our cousins.
So homosexuality is not a Western culture being forced on Africans. It is a worldwide wind that finally got to Africa.
The funny thing is that as far as I know, there was no gay rights movement in Nigeria. But all of a sudden, the Nigerian Senate gathered Nigerians together and dumped them inside a truck for a bungee jump.
At issue is this: Two people meet. They fall in love. They get married. They become respectable members of the society. They care for each other. They have children. They grow old together. One inherits what the first to die leaves behind.
That is the standard marriage life for a man and a woman.
Now, gay couples want to partake in that institution. It has triggered the gay rights movement all over the world. The movement seeks social equality and an end to discrimination based on sexual orientation.
For many opponents, it is a return to Sodom and Gomorrah.
In 2001, the Netherlands became the first country to legalize gay marriage. It has since been followed by Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Iceland, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, and Sweden. In the United States, six states have legalized gay marriage. They are Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont and the District of Columbia.
In the debate on gay rights, Africans invoke the African exceptionalism. African exceptionalism says that what happens in other parts of the world matters not to us because we are different.
In fact, for most Africans, gay lifestyle is an abomination. It is seen as being against God’s will and against tradition. The existence of gays in Africa is hardly acknowledged. There is a fear that mere acknowledgment disrupts the social order. There is a greater fear that granting any right to gays will only encourage homosexual behaviors.
South Africa is the only African country that allows gay marriage. For many Africans, gay rights movement is something foreign. Countries like Zimbabwe and Uganda are the headquarters of the anti-gay movement. Last January in Uganda, David Kato, a leading Ugandan gay rights activist was beaten to death.
With this bill, Nigeria has joined the team of anti-gay African countries.
In a debate on the floor of the Nigerian Senate, the senate president, David Mark said, “It’s incomprehensible to contemplate same sex marriage. I cannot be a party to it. There are enough men and women to marry one another. The whole idea is importation of foreign culture but this one would be a freedom too many. We cannot allow our tradition and value system to be eroded.”
This is not the first time the world has confronted a challenge like this. The fight to stop the trade in African slaves passed through the same moral dilemma. Some Christians and Muslims strongly believed that Africans slaves were sub-humans and did not deserve equal rights as the rest of humanity.
It happened again in the debate as to whether black people would be allowed to marry white people. Here, well-intended white people feared that black people marrying white would bring an end to the white race. That was when they came up with the slogan, ‘once you go black you don’t go back.’ There is a similar fear that once the gays are allowed to live we will all end up as gays.
In each of these kinds of challenges, the tough question is what do you do when each side’s idea of justice is at war? What do you do when there is no moral harmony? What do you do when change is unsettling? What do you do when doing nothing is not an option?
One of the most disarming arguments around the Nigerian question is that God, not the British, put Nigerians together in one country for a reason. What is the reason why God created gays?
Some will say that God has nothing to do with it. Which raises the question, Is it by nature or by nurture? If it is by nurture, why do some young gay kids commit suicide when faced with the bulling associated with being gay? Why wouldn’t they just switch over?
If you want to frighten an anti-gay African, tell him that his son or daughter may become gay. Watch him curse you out as if those parents whose children turned gay fired a missile at God. The fascinating thing is that these conservatives often have one gay child, as if life is saying to them ‘deal with it.’ Conservatives like Dick Cheney and Alan Keyes have had to contend with their children turning out to be gays. While Dick Cheney accepted her daughter, Alan Keyes banished his.
Every society is measured not by the way it treats its strong and privileged but how it treats its weak and disadvantaged. You do not have to hug the gay. You just have to give room in your heart for the dove and for the eagle to be.
Africa has scores of serious problems. Gay rights movement is not one of them. Anyone who tells you it is, is deceiving you.
If I hear the opponents of gay rights well, gay is a lifestyle and not an inherent sexual orientation. And as such, gays deserve discrimination from true sons and daughters of Africa. But what about the Igbo Osu Caste system? That lifestyle or is it orientation, is home grown. It cannot in any way be called a choice. Here Africans sanction discrimination against a group of people who have done nothing to be what they are labeled.
By the way, what is African about today’s crop of Africans? Is it the language that we speak? Is it the indomie that we eat? Is it the blue-eyed Jesus that we worship or the Arabic Mohammed that we bow to? Could it be that the only thing that is unAfrican is tolerance? The people who made Africans to burn up the symbols of the gods of their forefathers and to carry the cross and the crescent as replacements have said that you have to accept gay marriages and Africans are crying foul. Which God will protect you now? Your God or their God?
Guess what? The head of the African has long been chopped off like that of a captured fowl. What we are doing now is simply flapping our wings and splashing blood all around. It has long been over for us.
When Barack Obama, Hilary Clinton and David Cameron spoke about the need for Africans to respect gay rights, they made the classic mistake of not deploying George H. Bush’s ‘kinder and gentler’ tone. Like George H. Bush, they should have said to our divided African souls troubled by yet another change: “This is not a threat; this is not a boast. This is just the way things gonna be.”
Gays are here to stay. We can make all the noise that we want. Just like the West, we will eventually learn to accept it and live with it. It is the way of the world. Those who cannot stand it have one option: they can stop the world and jump out. The rest can look at the bright side – it is not the end of the world.
It may be the end of the world as we know it, but it is not the ultimate end of the world. If not for anything else, I trust the 99% of people who are for this anti-gay rights bill will hold fast to their sexuality. The world will only end when we all become gays. And that is not what gay rights is all about. If it were, I would have joined the 99% in saying, Tufiakwa!
Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Eternal West African foes, Nigeria and Ghana have another opportunity today to revive their rivalry as the home-based Eagles take on the Black Stars in the second semi-final of the 2014 African Nations Championship in South Africa.
Before the top-of-the-billing clash at the Free State Stadium in Bloemfontein, Libya and Zimbabwe will battle for the other ticket at stake.
Since last Saturday when both Nigeria and Ghana secured the semi final tickets, aficionados of the game in the continent knew that memories of this edition of CHAN will be one to treasure.
Despite this showdown devoid of high-profile foreign-based player the mind-game being played by both sub-regional rivals has helped to add quality to the competition.
The player who played a major role in reviving Eagles when Morocco was three goals up in the quarter final, Ejike Uzoenyi, insists Nigerians have nothing to worry about today.
“At this point we don't fear (Ghana); we can only respect them for reaching this stage because it's not easy.”
He however admitted that football fans in the country should not look forward to an easy match.
“One fact remains, nobody should expect an easy match but my belief is that having eliminated South Africa and Morocco, we can't hope for anything less than the cup,” stressed the petit- bomber.
His captain and first choice goal keeper of the team, Chigozie Agbim also re-echoes Uzoenyi's desire to play in the final after overcoming the Ghanaians today.
“Our desire in every game is to win and I believe in the semifinal, we will win by the grace of God.
“We came to compete. So, any day we can play against any country. We are not afraid of any country, including Ghana,” stressed Agbim.
Agbim assured Nigerians that Eagles would strive not to repeat the kind of mistakes they made against Morocco when they were trailing 3-0 at half time.
“We have learnt our lessons and it will not happen again,“ he further assured.
Eagles coaching crew led by Stephen Keshi should be happy now that right-back, Solomon Kwambe, is now available for selection after serving a one-match ban.
How the Black Stars will survive their goal scoring problem remains an uphill task for Coach Maxwell Konadu and his colleague.
They have just a miserly four goals to show so far as against the 12 that the Eagles have pumped into opponents' goals.
“Our attack has been such that we only manage one goal per match but we have been defending very well. That for me is a sign of a team that is progressing and I don't think it is a bad thing to defend very well,” coach Konadu admitted on Monday.
“It is also important to score goals but in cases when you score one goal in a match and manage to defend it, that means you will win.”
Luckily for him, the trio of Michael Akuffo, Abeiku Ainooson and Kwabena Adusei, who picked up knocks in the quarter-final clash against DR Congo are now available for selection.
Right-back Godfred Saka, who picked up a foot injury in the second Group C match against Libya, is now ready for the clash with Nigeria.
Nigeria has not defeated Ghana since 2006 when Eagles nicked a 1-0 win in the group stage of the Africa Cup of Nations in Egypt.
Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
The theme of the 1993 United Nations world conference on human rights in Vienna was Women’s Rights Are Human Rights. I was with the Civil Liberties Organisation then and attended the conference. Why was it necessary, you might ask, to state that incontestable fact 45 years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the very first article of which asserts unequivocally that “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights?” Aren’t women human beings? Funny as it may sound, the status of woman as human wasn’t always “settled.” Indeed, a much earlier conference is believed to have been convened in France, circa 586 A.D., to resolve the question whether or not women were human! It was my former colleague at the CLO, Chidi Anselm Odnkalu, now chairman of the National Human Rights Commission, who first mentioned this outrageous outcome of prejudice born of the fear of difference—whether it be racial, gender, religious, sexual, or even plainly ideological.
In having her humanity doubted, woman, the primal Other of history, the first to embody difference (ab-normal-ity, deviance from the perceived norm), shared a common fate with Africans, other so-called persons of colour, and many oppressed groups. Thus, as the great white men behind the American Declaration of Independence proclaimed the fact that “all men are born equal” to be a “self-evident” truth, their diction betrayed the exclusion of women from equal humanity. And it was not until 1920 that the 19th Amendment ensured political equality for American women by making them voting citizens in the self-vaunted land of freedom.
One of the disingenuous yet appealing justifications for the frightful antipathy to gays and lesbians in Nigeria is that same sex relations are foreign to African culture. Those who bay for the blood of homosexuals, who would have them jailed for 14 years even when billion-dollar thieves in government and business are awarded national honours—not to mention election riggers, wife beaters, child deserters and abusers, rapists, paedophiles, Daddy Overseers who fleece their flock and sleep with their female congregants (married and unmarried), etc.—justify their lack of Christian love, charity, or plain fellow feeling by resort to a cheap and convenient cultural nationalism. Respect for the equal humanity of gay persons, they say, is a foreign concept being imposed on us by the imperialistic West. And then without batting an eyelid, they quote from the Bible or the Koran—as if Christianity and Islam were African religions! But they fail to cite one African religious or cultural practice that punishes homosexuals with the force of law. Or an African jurisprudence that sanctions imprisonment as a form of penal justice.
In a series of essays published in December 2011 and January 2012 on the dangerous tide of homophobia in our land—see “Homosexuality and Nigeria’s Enochs and Josephs,” “Homosexuality, Biology and the Bible,” and “Sex and the Church’s Missionary Position” (The Guardian, 19 and 28 December 2011 and 9 and 10 January 2012), as well as “Ekwe and the Raging Army of God’s Protectors” (Vanguard, 23 January 2013); also available online, particularly at http://saharareporters.com/columnist/ogaga-ifowodo—I asked the venerable Rev. Jasper Akinola, the spiritual-cum-political leader of the anti-gay movement, why, if he was the über-cultural nationalist that he claims to be, he scorned the Church of Orunmila and chose to be a priest of the Church of England? An Anglican congregation, if he needs to be reminded, founded and headed by King Henry VIII in protest against the Roman Catholic Church’s refusal to indulge his appetite for adultery.
A church, moreover, that was the ideological bulwark in Britain’s imperialist mission of colonial conquest through the “wiping out of the tribal (read cultural) memory” of the natives (to adapt Major Pilkings’s apt rebuke, in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman, of Joseph, his native houseboy who, converted yesterday, had become the next day an unwilling native informer on the “primitive,” unchristian, ways of his recently colonised Yoruba people). I am yet to receive an answer from the retired primate of King Henry’s Nigerian converts. We know, however, that the purported defence of African values (defined by whom?) is only a fig leaf to cover an onerous legacy of the Abrahamic faiths: making a sin of sexual desire, whether it be hetero- or homo-social in nature. Not even after marriage—a social undertaking not to be confused with the natural, hormone-driven, impulse of sexual orientation—was sanctioned as an inconvenient solution was the problem solved.
But in blaming the West for something that has been present in every human society and in the animal world as well from the origin of time, the self-righteous army of God forgets that the West persecuted homosexuals until quite recently. Now more Catholic than the pope, they cannot bear to hear the same West that brought them the bible change its mind about any of its creeds and catechisms. “How dare you admit,” they shout, foaming at the mouth and wagging a finger at the Archbishop of Canterbury, “that gay people do not choose their sexuality any more than heterosexuals choose theirs, and then proceed to treat them as human beings equal to us virtuous heterosexuals? How dare you ordain a gay bishop in OUR church?”
The zealotry of Nigeria’s army of the faithful fits perfectly the ungovernable fervour of the reformed sinner who, once converted, must prove him- or herself more devoted to the cross or crescent than his pastor or imam. Thus, if Pope Francis, reminded of Christ’s admonition, “Judge not that ye may not be judged,” can say in response to the question of gay priests, “Who am I to judge?”, Nigeria and Africa’s religious leaders say, “We are the ones to judge and punish. God is too merciful and his judgement too long in coming.” This is the sort of holy frenzy that makes full-grown African men and women sing with all pious sincerity, “Wash me [Lord Jesus] and I shall be whiter than snow!”
But the question is inescapable: are homosexuals human beings? If the answer is yes, then they must be accorded their human rights and dignity. Sexual relations among consenting adults are no more harmful to society in same sex relations than in opposite sex relationships. If there be any harm, it is the mad rush in the name of a strange and false notion of African values and the dictates of foreign religious doctrines imposed by conquest, to erode the laws of privacy and civilised behaviour to criminalise what is at worst a sin, as if God cannot be trusted to punish that among other sins on judgement day. Yet, by pandering to the prejudices of a majority closed to reason, that cannot be persuaded by logic—recall that it was the majority that freed Barabbas the murderer and crucified Jesus—or scientific evidence such as is changing the mind of the West that once thought homosexuality was a disease, the result of a psychiatric disorder, to authorise the draconian re-criminalisation of same-sex relations, President Jonathan may have unwittingly done the gay and lesbian community, all of rational humanity, a favour.
For the law will not make homosexuals disappear from, or cease to be born in, Nigeria. After all, where do homosexuals come from, if not from heterosexual parents? Persecuting them will only make that barbaric stance solidify Nigeria’s reputation as a country quick to descend on the weak, poor and vulnerable while straining every muscle to protect and honour the rich and powerful. Yet, it is invariably the case that whenever power has to resort to maximum force to have its way, it has lost the moral ground and is very close to defeat. And so to our brothers and sisters persecuted for being gay, I say take courage: the darkest hour of night is just before midnight.
Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
.There is a new sexually transmitted super-bug officially called H041 that experts say may be more deadly that AIDS.
This strain of STD which is resistant to antibiotic, reportedly kills half of those exposed and infects one in 20 hospital patients—which raises the threat of an outbreak to emergency levels.
According to a CNBC report, an antibiotic-resistant strain of gonorrhea is more aggressive than the HIV virus, which means the potential to infect the public will be greater.
Like most STDs, gonorrhea is usually transmitted through unprotected sexual contact and if left untreated, can cause severe medical complications, such as infertility in women, debilitating pain, sterility in men and life threatening heart infections.
Alan Christianson, a doctor of naturopathic medicine, thinks this new strain has the power to rack up more fatalities than AIDS. To date, more than the 30 million people have already died worldwide from AIDS-related complications
Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
