The Looted Funds from Nigeria Have Found Other Destinations

0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 50 Second

“Nigerian treasury looters have found new destinations for their loot: Persian Gulf, India and China. This revelation came from former United States Ambassador to Nigeria, Ambassador John Campbell, one of the speakers at the 2010 Achebe Colloquium on Africa,” a Nigerian newspaper, This Day reported two days ago, Sunday 5th of December 2010.

According to the report titled, “China, India, others now haven for Nigerian loot”, the funds looted from Nigeria are no longer going to Switzerland, France, United Kingdom or the United States. Instead, the new destination for Nigerian looted money is now Persian Gulf, India, and perhaps China.

This is exactly the point. Somebody is not doing the right calculation about the Nigerian pitiable situation, the artificial hardship that has been created for the Nigerian people.

The politicians are pretending to be gentle now as they beg to be voted into power, come 2011. But not sooner they have gotten the mandate will many become passionate looters of the Nigerian oil money and rubbing the nation’s name in the mud.

They think they have created a philosophy: “it’s the National Cake; you chop, I chop”. Well, it is because many Nigerians are not asking the right question: “how can you have your cake if you have eaten it?”

Any singular “Naira” that is burgled out from the Nigerian state and taken abroad for safekeeping is both a “double incident of loss” and a serious impediment to the Nigerians’ ability to develop their local system and depend on themselves. See the article, “Underdeveloping Africa through Corruption”, an extract from the research, “UNDERDEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA: My Hands Are Clean”.

Let’s get the mathematics clearer.

Firstly, the money in question was stolen from the public funds, meaning loss number one to Nigeria and Nigerians. Secondly, the guy who has stole the money think he is intelligent by taken the money to India or China, where it will eventually be invested to create job opportunities for the Chinese or Indian youths. That is the loss number two to Nigeria, because whatever China or India has gained in that regard, Nigeria has certainly lose.

If we further extend this argument, the situation will automatically emerge clearer. At least, to those who will accept the bitter truth that corruption in Nigeria is being deliberately used to punish the common people and deny them the ability to depend on themselves.

By siphoning the public funds meant for the creation of electricity, the construction of good roads and the provision of medical facilities, it means that Nigerians will have to depend on other people to provide them with their means of livelihood. Whereas the Nigerian people would have been able to satisfy their own needs, if the government had provided the needed facilities.

It can even be much simpler. Just because the person who is in charge of the power project has taken the project money to his private bank account in India or China automatically means that the Nigerian factory owner who produces toothpaste will have to generate his own power. Meanwhile, the individually generated energy is far more expensive and oftentimes hazardous to the environment, especially in the case of continues burning of diesel to power electric generators, not to talk of the noise and nuisance to the Nigerian public.

Quite apart from that, the consequence of the additional cost is that the aforementioned toothpaste will now become more expensive, so that the producer can recover his additional money. Yet, the real danger to the local economic development is only waiting at the corner.

According to several economic analysts, what really determines production is not necessarily the desire to produce, but the demand for the good that is produced. Therefore, for the singular reason that the Nigerian producer of toothpaste has increased his price will mean that he stands the risk of not, even, selling his product. This is because with the global economic competitiveness of the 21st century, a toothpaste producer in Italy who do not have to pay the extra cost for power generation, like his Nigerian counterpart will easily dominate the market, simply by selling at cheaper prices to the Nigerian consumers.

The real result from the above situation is that the Nigerian producer will eventually become jobless, because when his consumers can no longer afford his products himself would no longer have a reason to keep producing, thanks to the Nigerian corruption.

The ordinary Nigerians deserve better, please do not take away their money and their means of survival.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Sudan: To Be or Not To Be

0 0
Read Time:4 Minute, 15 Second

Sudan is one of the countries that will always remain indispensable in the African continent. It’s not just because a most renowned African civilisation, the ancient Nubian society once flourished there, or that it is the biggest African country; Sudan is of special important to Africa, both due to its strategic position and what it represents, historically and culturally. It’s equally important as a major destination for African scholars and historians who must dig up the remains of ancient Nubians, in order to authenticate the histories of African people.

Yet, Sudan is one of the countries in Africa that have hardly known peace, especially since these last few decades. Civil wars, genocides, religious scheming; some have even documented what they called “the Sudanese ethnic cleansing”, and those who claim to be the (international) watchdog for human rights have said it will never happen again.

Now the cloud is gathering once more and the indications are spreading both fear and deep apprehensions about the future of this African country.

“The upcoming 2010 elections and 2011 referendum in Sudan are the culminating events of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between the National Congress Party and the Sudanese People’s Liberation Movement.  However, looking at 2011 and beyond, there is increasing concern that Sudan may revert to violence rather than move forward toward the sustainable peace envisioned by the CPA…”

At October 2009 when the United States Institute of Peace made the above report, some people would have concluded that it was still too early to judge. The vast African country is now a month and few days away from facing one of its most vital moments as a country, the referendum to decide the independence of southern Sudan.

“As January 9 approaches tension continues to escalate with accusations of voter intimidation, disputed bombings along the border and a wave of aggressive rhetoric stoking uncertainty on both sides of the still contested north-south border…,” Reuters, last Saturday, 4th December, 2010.

Below is an appeal by a Sudanese artist and advocate, Emmanuel Jal. He was a child soldier during the last Sudanese civil war, between the north and south of the country.

“My country is on the brink of war. On January 9, Southern Sudan will vote for its independence to be free from a government who has slaughtered and displaced our people for 43 years. The country is currently led by a regime bent on controlling oil resources.  80% of Sudan’s oil fields are in the south, making it a prime battleground to displace our indigenous people.  Both north and south are preparing for war, leaving innocent people at grave risk of major human rights violations. The last civil war between North and South claimed over 2 million lives, including my own mother. I have firsthand experience as a war child, forced to fight in the conflict and torn from my family. The time to prevent another genocide is now. I have a written a new single called “We Want Peace”.  It is a call for peace, protection and justice for all in my land, and also for an end to conflicts affecting innocent people all around the world. Thank you for joining me in my struggle.”

Come to think of it; what does independent Sudan or the united Sudan really mean?

Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader while serving as the head of African Union last years was advocating for the united states of Africa. Whether his proposal was merely political or he truly meant what he said, especially that he latter called for the partitioning of Nigeria along ethnic or religious lines, people must understand that no singular African country is too big or so culturally complicated that it cannot be governed by one central government.

Instead, in Sudan, like Nigeria or Congo, there are enormous natural resources that there is no easier way to reap off those natural resources for the benefit of the capitalist Europe an America without playing ethnic and religious politics in those African countries.

In essence, whether Sudan remains one country or end up divided into one hundred countries, few questions will remain central. Are the local leaders truly ready to defend the interests and survival of their own people; are they willing to make little sacrifices, to shun the alluring proposals of moneybags western politicians and businessmen so that the local resources can be use to develop the local community? This is where the argument lies.

The problem of Sudan, like in many other African countries is not the geopolitical or cultural complicity of the country; it’s rather more of a leadership problem and the non-accountability of the leaders to the local people.

So, since it’s usually the failure at the central entity which causes its components to disintegrate, African leaders should defend the interests and survivals of their own citizens, irrespective of their ethnic origins, then those same citizens will reciprocate by protecting their national unity and collective aspirations as a people.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %