Governance: The Cankerworm of Protocol and A Word Of Caution For Buhari

0 0
Read Time:5 Minute, 13 Second

Protocol and bureaucracy is part and parcel of modern governance and without it, systematic administration will grind to a halt. But the practice of protocol and the workings of bureaucracy in African countries leaves a sour taste in the mouth.

Our leaders are surrounded with multiple layers of protocol and governance is tardy and untidy due to bureaucratic machineries. The way some of our leaders carry on with this protocol thing, one will wonder whether that is all there is to governance.

Political leaders in Nigeria don’t derive their importance and satisfaction from executing people-focused projects. They derive such satisfaction from being driven in long siren-blaring convoys and being addressed in a paragraph of titles. Some governors are being addressed as His Excellency, Senator, Professor, Dr, Barrister, Chief John…

It is sickening how you see these leaders surrounded by hundreds of aides, perfectly shielding them from the people they are supposed to be leading. The leaders don’t move with the people anymore and so can’t understand what the people suffer.

How can they fix roads they don’t travel on? How can they fix hospitals they don’t get treated in? How can they understand our internet problems and network wahala when they have got special phones and Sims customized for them by these cut throat telecommunication companies?

Even some of the leaders with good intentions will end up failing because they have smoked protocol like marijuana. They are high on protocols but low on the needs of the people. They are buried in protocol and bureaucracy, surrounded by ass-licking aides who are only concerned in singing the leaders praises for their own selfish ends.

A former Vice President of Nigeria once described Aso Rock Villa as a prison. During the Goodluck Jonathan administration there was a saga with a supposed phone call to the King of Morocco and President Goodluck didn’t even know about it weeks after the mass media was awashed with the story.

It’s like these aides usually convince our leaders that they are too important to read the papers; they shut them out from the real world and convince them that anyone that says anything contrary to their policies is an enemy.

Government officials cannot even detect the rot in the system; rot happening right in their ministries because they don’t pay unscheduled visits to parastatals, agencies and project sites in the name of protocol. How can a Minister or Commissioner of Education find out the rot in a secondary school when he can’t pay unscheduled visit to such a school?

They will have to announce weeks before such a visit, allowing the corrupt school administrators to give the school a cosmetic facelift. When the government official arrives, he is usually more interested in the red carpet reception, the rendition of his everlasting titles and the yams they will give him to take back than in engaging the administrators, looking at the books and asking probing questions.

Children whose parents have not been paid for months will line up to wave at the government official and sing welcome songs on empty stomachs. This is governance for our leaders. In 1991, I was in primary 2 in Government Primary School, Abakpa, Ogoja, CRS, when Ibrahim Babangida visited Ogoja. We were asked to line up the road to wave him welcome.

Imagine 7-year olds standing under the sun for hours, famished and dog-tired, just to wave to our President for a few seconds while he drove by in a tinted, air-conditioned bullet proof car. He didn’t even have the courtesy to wind down and wave back to the leaders of tomorrow. For years all I dreamt about was to drive in that kind of car and punish other children to wave at me just as I was punished.

Yes it was a punishment. My dad who was a police sergeant had died 2 years before the President’s visit. No one paid us any death benefits. We were plunged into abject penury. My widowed mother had just toiled to get me a new uniform and that was my sin for being punished for hours under the sun. I was selected because my uniform was new and clean. As I stood under that blistering Ogoja sun waiting to wave at IBB, I wished I wore the ragged uniform I had worn for months before Mama bought me the new one.

Who knows maybe this set of leaders are also taking their pound of flesh? Somewhere and somehow they have picked up the idea that governance is about long titles, red carpets, siren blaring convoys, endless trips abroad, doing nothing, feeling important and gathering a choir of aides to sing their Responsorial Psalm of praises.

In Nigeria if it is not slow it is not governance. Government officials behave as if they come to office without their brains. You will give someone a 2 paragraph letter or 1 page proposal to read and 6 months later he will tell you he is still looking into it. Abeg you no fit read? You don’t look into letters and proposals, you read them and take action.

I believe this is what President Buhari is trying to stop by the recent directive that ministers must take permission from the presidency before travelling out of Abuja. This seems laudable but it will create more problems than it will solve. This will increase the problem of shutting the leaders away from the people. And it will also increase the ceremony in their visits. This will not be good for us.

Ministers should be encouraged to pay regular unscheduled, convoy-less visits to agencies, institutions and projects sites under their ministries. This will enable them gather firsthand knowledge and improve service delivery to the people. This should be exemplified by the President. If administrators realize that the President, Governors and Ministers can visit anytime, unannounced and ask questions they will sit up.

And don’t tell me that is not how governance works here; I know, but I think that is how it should work.

First Baba Isa (FBI) writes from Abuja

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

The Need for Holistic and Altruistic Approaches to IGR and Taxation in Nigeria

0 0
Read Time:8 Minute, 15 Second

This is not an academic or professional article about what IGR or taxes are. We already know what they are and the role they play in governance in any country. This is more about our leaders’ attitude and approaches to implementing them effectively, such that they will be more publicly understood and acceptable.
On the back of recent economic woes that has befallen the states in Nigeria, and the Federal Government, several state governors seem to have woken up and are gradually coming to their senses and the cries of the need to increase, improve or, for some, establish Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) and taxation in their territories have suddenly dominated their statements to the public through press interviews, projects commissioning and workshop opportunities. In most cases, these erstwhile profligate and corrupt politicians are speaking through the sides of their mouths because they either do not know what they are talking about or they are playing up to the gallery to cover past misdeeds and to appear to the public that they are still there with the knowledge of what to do about their ailing and moribund economies.

In saner and more civilised countries, where decent politics, democracy and good governance have been embraced by all, both leaders and followers; IGR and taxations are no longer issues; they are normal governance procedures. The leaders who are elected do not need to chase after IGR and taxes; these are already in place to support them in delivering the goods to their people. And the people from who these are collected are assured that whatever is collected from their salaries, business profits and other incomes will be used altruistically and suitably for their benefit and not corruptly for those they elected or are appointed to rule them.
These two interconnecting facts do not exist in Nigeria. People, perhaps understandably, do not want to pay taxes and contribute to IGR because of the ingrained perception that such money extorted from them will disappear into the rulers’ pockets to fuel inordinate wealthy lifestyles, and even worse, to oppress them. In fact, we see the evidence every day in the way our elected and appointed officials behave in public, internally and outside in the wider world.
Herein lays the dilemma for both rulers and followers – lack of trust, lack of credibility, lack of sincerity, lack of purposeful leadership and lack of trusting followership, as well as an ignorant, indifferent and unsympathetic public. A dilemma or difficult circumstance of our own creation from which there seems no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions – dubbed “a catch-22 situation”.
A little digression: Just a few months ago, a local government chief executive sought my advice, and a possible contract for me, on exploring and exploiting new sources of IGR in his local government area, as well as improving on what little they already have. I came back to him after one month with just four pages of comprehensive and implementable ideas, including new sources and execution methods that will pay the salaries of his staff; will reduce dependency on the federal or state allocations so that the federal handouts will be released for developmental and other local authority projects. He was ecstatic, but unfortunately for both of us, for me on a business consideration; he told me his governor did not warm to the ideas. I know what he meant. There seemed to be not enough money in the ideas to benefit his “oga”.

Then recently, the governor of the State of Osun proclaimed that he is recruiting “Tax Marshals” to boost the revenue base of the state. Remember the State of Osun was the worst offender that failed to pay the salaries of his workers for almost eight months, before the federal bail-out came, and even now is still owning many month’s unpaid salaries, and not very sure of its ability to continue paying the salaries. Who or what is a Tax Marshal? I will let him answer that, but I sure hope it is not like that of Lagos State, where they say over 25% (please don’t quote me, the figure is always varying, because nobody knows the true figure) of the taxes and revenue collected goes into the tax consultant’s pocket in fees.

A friend then wrote me: “The challenge for Osun is to create jobs and attract investments, first and foremost. Without jobs, organisations, factories, shops, or commerce there will be no taxes to collect. As a matter of fact if you recruit ‘Tax Marshals’ who go about intimidating entrepreneurs, prospective investors are driven away.

To encourage investors, your tax regime must be liberal initially as well as competitive. Knowing Osun and Nigeria, these civil servant ‘Tax Marshals’ will be underpaid, owed months of unpaid wages, will have no other alternative than to demand bribes from shopkeepers, companies, factories or other organisations.
When Awolowo and the AG developed Ikeja, Ilupeju and other industrial and commercial estates, the tax regime was initially low. Lagos state is now the biggest beneficiary of Awolowo’s foresight and investment. The industries and commercial concerns are tied in already. So Lagos State could impose stricter tax regimes.
Has [Governor] Aregebesola created investment, industrial or commercial bases [and enabling environment] in Osun yet? Is Osun attracting investors? Let Aregbesola lay the foundation like Awolowo did, then Osun will gain the tax benefits in the future”. (Olukayode Nathan)
Furthermore, development initiatives are not about just the federal allocations or IGR. It is about developing the human capital through applicable education, skills development, providing basic infrastructure; portable water, electricity, transportation, roads, telecommunications and in these says the Internet. Any government not addressing those developmental initiatives is a failure. Any government not providing good education to the youths is a disaster no matter how big the IGR.
Are the vast majority of children achieving in schools and colleges? For Lagos and Akwa Ibom or any other state, the answer is NO.
Are the state governments providing for the health and welfare of their people? The evidence show there is lack of basic infrastructure; lack of portable water, health facilities, lack of sewage facilities etc. in most parts and indeed the rural parts of both Akwa Ibom and Lagos states, or any other state in Nigeria for that matter. So both states like all other states fail the test.

We need to be objective rather than defend ineptitude. None of the governors or public officers in those states would send their children to their public schools including the universities, and as we often see, they and members of their families will use the state-built hospitals for medical care. A good and poignant example is that of former Akwa Ibom State Governor, Godswill Akpabio, now a senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, who had claimed and shouted to the rooftops during his tenure as governor that he has built a “world-class hospital” only to be flown abroad for treatment of minor injuries he sustained when he was involved in a car accident in Abuja a few months ago. How do we explain this incongruity and hypocrisy?

The problem is that our politicians never think of legacy building; they never think of building and erecting foundations for the future or for the next generation. They are very myopic, and do not see beyond their noses, all clouded by greed, self-interest and thievery. They want it NOW, during their tenure, mainly because of the profit in kickbacks and bribes and the exaggerated glory that will come to them during their tenure only. “What do I care about the next government or the next generation?” that is their thought.

That is one of the main reasons why the development of our industrial, infrastructure, investment and commercial bases are so poor. They make no attempt to leave some legacy behind; no continuity of purpose and governance. Even in the same political party, a new incoming governor or local government chairman wants to start afresh, just to make his own money and empower a few family and friends and then proceeds to dismantle and discard the little that his predecessor managed to do.
It is very sad, this phenomenon. With so many dearth of ingenuity and resourcefulness from our so called leaders, it is no wonder most states are in distress in Nigeria and go begging, cap in hand for the Federal Allocation in Abuja, out of which they even embezzle most.
Fiscal federalism or autonomy is a very long unachievable dream in our times, if the mind-set of both rulers and the ruled stay primordial and suffocatingly corrupt, because the revenue allocation formula in Nigeria inevitably encourages parasitic governance where states become relaxed and endlessly expectant of the monthly ritual of allocation from the federal government. According to Dare Arowolo, a lecturer in the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba, Ondo State, the implication of this is that while the allocation formula limits the capacity of states to provide public goods needed to promote and sustain governance, it also predates on the Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) of each state, thus making the states perpetually dependent on the Federal Government.

The surest way to at least partial fiscal federalism by both the states and local governments not only lies in an altruistic approach to generating internal revenue but also a sincere and holistic will and commitment to using the income so generated.
In a way, we should be happy that the mind-sets are changing, but why should it be only when reality has set in; only when the price of crude oil, which we have depended on for so many years that we have neglected other sources of revenue, has fallen to very economically-dangerous levels?
We are in it together!!!

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Taraba Tribunal Decision: Judicial Vandalism Vs Political Rascality

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 57 Second

Since the tribunal declared Aisha Jummai Hassan the duly elected Governor of Taraba State ahead of Darius Ishaku who the tribunal held was not duly elected a candidate of the PDP, I did not see a copy of the judgment until some hours ago.

The tribunal declared the candidate of the APC the governor of Taraba State on the grounds that the PDP candidate was not duly elected such in a valid primaries supervised by INEC. An INEC official testified that when he went to Jalingo to supervise the PDP primaries, he found no one on ground.

At first glance this looks like a sound judgment and a nunc demittis to the rascality of political parties in foisting candidates on us and treating party primaries like their personal picnics. We are all tired of this jamboree. We should all say “serve the PDP right” and sit down. But wait.

Maybe someone is trying to exploit this our angst and “tiredness”. What if a judicial vandalism of our laws is being committed to cure a political rascality? I can’t say that; but what if? Let’s begin by stating the reason given by the PDP for holding their primaries in Abuja: security. The tribunal didn’t buy that, but interestingly, the tribunal sat in Abuja, instead of Jalingo, for the same reason.

It is my considered opinion that party primaries are pre-election matters clearly out of the scope of the tribunal. The tribunal must have reasoned that Governor Darius was not qualified to contest the election by the virtue of section 138(1) (a) of the Electoral Act which states “An election may be questioned on any of the following grounds that is to say: that a person whose election is questioned was, at the time of the election, not qualified to contest the election.”

Assuming without conceding that the qualification being referred to in section 138 supra includes being duly elected during primaries can Darius Ishaku be said not to have been duly elected just because the primaries didn’t hold in Jalingo? And assuming again without conceding that Darius is not qualified to contest the election is declaring the APC candidate the legal thing to do?

Let’s turn to section 140 of the Electoral Act to be guided: “(1) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, if the Tribunal or the Court as the case may be, determines that a candidate who was returned as elected was not validly elected on any ground, the Tribunal or the Court shall nullify the election. (2) Where an election tribunal or court nullifies an election on the ground that the person who obtained the highest votes at the election was not qualified to contest the election, the election tribunal or court shall not declare the person with the second highest votes as elected, but shall order a fresh election.”

Read this section 140 again and then wonder with me where the tribunal got the legal justification to declare the APC candidate the outright winner of the Taraba gubernatorial election after holding that Darius Ishaku was not qualified to contest.

I agree that the rascality in our political ecosystem is odious but we should be careful not to exchange one rascality with another. You cannot vandalize the law to force people to keep the laws. Let’s be careful before we enthrone disaster in place of madness.

First Baba Isa (FBI) writes from Abuja
07037162029
meandisa@gmail.com
52F84BE5
@firstbabaisa

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

A People’s Aversion to the Truth is their Undoing

0 0
Read Time:8 Minute, 16 Second

“There is not a truth existing which I fear or wish unknown to the whole world.” – Thomas Jefferson
“When it comes to the truth, the real bias is thinking any one side has a monopoly on it.” – A Barton Hinkle.
Three events or incidences prompted me to write this article.
First one was the wide dissemination of an article purportedly written by our esteemed professor and Nobel Laureate, Wole Soyinka in tribute to Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, heaping praises on him and giving reasons why he, Tinubu, is such a great political strategist, even though not a saint, and great Yorubaman who rescued Nigeria from the clutches of the evil PDP. When I read the article, I immediately suspected it could not have been the handiwork of Kongi; I responded to my friends, most of who are in the same political persuasion as I am. I was immediately chastised by most of them, their rationalization being that it does not matter who the author is; it was the content that we should accept. I was aghast! So if Prof Wole Soyinka decided to sue the people wrongly ascribing the article to him, what would they then say? Or if the real author decided to sue Prof Soyinka for plagiarism, what would my friends say or do in his defence? We have since learnt that the said article was indeed written by someone else.
Second was the case of Col (rtd.) Sambo Dasuki, the besieged erstwhile National Security Adviser to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan who is now embroiled in a fight for his freedom after being accused of mismanaging billions of Naira and Dollars meant to purchase arms for the Nigerian military to fight Boko Haram. I remember when this man was appointed, there was so much encomium heaped on him. He was this, he was that; the next best thing to sliced bread; expert in internal and external security, counter-terrorism, counter-insurgency, best soldier in the Nigeria Army, highly regarded world-wide, blah, blah blah!! His CV was as long as my two arms extended; attended hundreds of courses, degrees, certificates, trips abroad, conferences, workshops, seminars, etc. I said to myself then, “This is the end of Boko Haram in Nigeria”. Alas, it turned out he was just there for his pocket and/or to enrich some interested individuals or groups.
It goes the same way with 99.9% of our government officials – elected or appointed. They all have the best education and achievements comparable to any and even superior to many in the whole world, but unfortunately with no sense of responsibility and commitment to service to their country and people; ONLY to their own pockets and family. Their education, achievements, accolades and success are then exposed as only a means to get to power and loot the treasury or defraud and oppress their own people; a dearth of leadership, responsibility and sincerity of purpose in this potentially great country that is only too obvious anywhere and everywhere you look.
And third, the case of the “29,000 Nigerians awaiting deportation from the United Kingdom, and 500 of them deported in one day, in one chartered plane to Nigeria just a day ago”. Again, I wrote that this is not possible! 500 Nigerians who are unwilling to go home packed in one plane, with how many guards? At what cost to the British Government? I was again buttonholed by some people who think they are more patriotic than I am (the same trait that our rulers have always had, yet loot the country and deprive their people the dividends of democracy and a developed nation). As it turned out, only 48 Nigerians were deported that day, with probably more to come in batches. Where did our journalists and reporters get the 500 figure from? Nowhere, but they just have to enhance or embellish the news so that they can sell papers, and the gullible people swallowed the lies, as they know they would.
The more I read our newspapers and the social media, listen to our politicians and civil servants, and notice often knee-jerk, misinformed reactions of my people, I have come to believe that my people just do not want to hear the truth. They really just want to be lied to, beautiful lies that make them feel good, make then forget their sorrows and the sins committed by them and against them, that make them seem to be part of their often corrupt and totally immoral governments and fit with what they really want to believe.
Trying to tell the truth to our people is absolutely futile. Trying to tell people the truth after they have been lied to their entire lives, as Nigerians have been lied to almost since their Independence, isn’t really worthwhile at all, it just gets you called a reactionary. In fact, they turn you into the Liar, and make you start questioning your own insanity and integrity. Many people only hear what they want to hear. Anybody that provides them lies is telling the “truth”. It is a psychological trait.
I will admit that in philosophy, Truth is very relative. There is no absolute Truth, but in saner societies, some kind of Truth-based ideology and tenet has been the defining and engaging foundation to their development as better societies for their (and other) people to live in. I have never before encountered a people and country where Truth is so much in short supply as to be completely non-existent as Nigeria. There is a deliberate dearth of Truth and fact, not the least aided by devilish politicians, unconcerned civil servants, selfish businessmen/women, and, wait for it, the society (people) itself.
I have always written that there is no Truth in Nigeria; nobody tells the Truth; nobody wants to hear and accept the Truth; the Truth is often hard to find or discern from the loads of information, or misinformation that is often spewed out on a daily basis by all sectors of the Nigerian society. We all want to hear what we want to hear, and this is what our rulers use to keep us ignorant and in bondage. Most of our leaders are intelligent (intelligent only enough to know how to pull the wool over the eyes of the rest of us and how to loot the treasury and still appear like heroes); but why are they like that? We were clamouring for a graduate President a while ago; then we had one with late Yar ‘Adua (B Sc Chemistry) and then, presto! Another one with a PhD in Zoology, Dr Jonathan; and Nigeria suddenly became an educated elite country; then what happened? Education is not a prerequisite to good governance, I have come to appreciate. It helps, but ONLY if the person has a good heart towards his people. That’s leadership.
Nigerians like sensational news and the ruling class knows this, so they spin us load of lies and we buy it hook line and sinker. They ALL TELL LIES. The newspapers that are supposed to feed us with correct information are even worse, bunch of lazy journalists who are easily compromised to write stories that suit the ruling elite, but manipulative of the gullible masses. All they know how to do is cut and paste. Imagine publishing that 500 illegal immigrants deported when in actual fact it was only 48. They cannot even verify the news before going to print.
We as a people don’t like taking responsibility for our own actions; someone else has to be blamed for their inadequacies. Hence Dasuki now was trying to implicate his boss and others. Examples abound in Nigeria. Have we ever heard of any ruler, ex-ruler (president, governor, LG chairman, minister, etc.) come out and admit culpability for their actions or inactions? No, they are all hiding under some cover or the other, shifting blames to one another and obfuscating and perverting the course of justice. Some even go as far as seeking court injunctions from corrupt judges to prevent investigation and arrest. Some cases against these so-called leaders have been in courts for over 10 years with no end in sight as to logical judgement or even a decision. Is that the Truth? But our leaders and even followers will cling on to the “Rule of Law”. Why does the rule of law apply when it comes to prosecution but does not apply when the crimes are being perpetrated?
The truth forces one to question the foundational beliefs one holds. If enough erroneous foundational beliefs can be manufactured in one’s belief system, the harder it will be for them to accept the truth when it stands right in front of them. People adhere to religion because they don’t want to have to change their foundational beliefs. I think everyone is guilty of feeling susceptible by some facet of the world around us, something out there could indeed force us to look at the world differently and we are all uncomfortable with that idea. Fear of the unknown is a powerful stimulus to continue in the same direction even if doing so is a bad idea. In present times, continuing down our shared road to ruin just to feel contented with ourselves is a really bad idea.
The truth should set you free; that is the familiar tenet. So why do our people actually choose to keep themselves imprisoned? Why do we consider the truth to be a menace? Most importantly, who made us think this way and why? What are being kept secret from us and why?
Why do we desire CHANGE, but are not ready to CHANGE? Your guess is as good as mine. I shouldn’t care anymore, but I cannot help myself. It is my country and my people, anyway I look.
Tell the Truth always!!!!

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Appeal Court declares Igbuya winner of Sapele Constituency Seat

0 0
Read Time:1 Minute, 55 Second

The Speaker, Delta State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon Monday Igbuya, on Tuesday labelled his victory at the Court of Appeal as triumph for the common man and for democracy.

He also described his victory as significant for the development of the state, particularly Sapele Constituency.

In a statement in Asaba, Igbuya not only praised the judiciary for dismissing Felix Anirah’s case but said his election was a well-deserved mandate.

He thanked the people of Sapele for the confidence reposed on him.

“My confidence in the nation’s judiciary is renewed. The court judgment went in my favour despite the speculation that the outcome will go in favour of my opponent whose party is at the centre”.

Igbuya also described the April election as the most transparent ever seen in the history of Sapele,

“God saw me through the challenging times of the electioneering process, the litigations that followed and of course my emergence as first Urhobo speaker in Delta State.

He urged the people to support him to succeed especially as Speaker of the sixth Assembly.

“I am grateful to the people of Sapele Constituency for the mandate as demonstrated in their overwhelming votes to the PDP in the April election”.

Igbuya while extending a hand of fellowship to his opponent and brother from Sapele, said now that the litigations are over, he should join him in the task of developing Sapele Constituency.

Igbuya said the victory would spur him to work harder to improve the welfare of the people of his constituency

He noted that he is inspired by the victory at the Appeal court, promising to continue to serve the House of Assembly which he is the Speaker with the fear of God.

“I am grateful to God for this victory. He has never failed me. This is not just my victory but that of Sapele, Delta State and the House of Assembly. My heart is filled with great joy” the statement added.

Appeal court sitting in Benin-city, Edo State Tuesday upheld the ruling of the Election Petition Tribunal, Asaba which declared the Speaker of the Delta State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Monday Igbuya winner of the April 2015 House of Assembly election for Sapele constituency.

By Njamanze Fidel

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Okonjo-Iweala Requests Fg To Call Reckless Governor Oshiomhole To Order

0 0
Read Time:1 Minute, 50 Second

– FORMER MINISTER HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH $2.1BILLION ARMS ISSUE

Former Minister of Finance, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has requested the Federal Government to call Edo State Governor, Mr Adams Oshiomhole to order over the Governor’s recent efforts to link her name to the alleged $2.1 billion arms issue.

The Minister stressed that she has absolutely nothing to do with the issue.

She stated that it is an abuse of public office, the judicial process and her human rights for Governor Oshiomhole whom she stopped from taking a highly suspicious N15 billion loan to make false allegations against her while hiding behind the constitutional immunity granted state governors.

As recently confirmed by the Debt Management Office, professional analysis showed that Oshiomhole’s loan request which was based on using low interest World Bank loan to offset high interest commercial loans would have left Edo state with a heavy debt burden and the the state would have found it very difficult to pay back.

She said that it is unconscionable for the Governor to embark on a campaign of lies against her because she thwarted his dubious loan request.

She described the Governor’s unsubstantiated allegations as a cynical personalization of the anti-corruption campaign to achieve ignoble objectives.

Dr Okonjo-Iweala therefore put Oshiomhole and his ilk on notice that she has briefed her lawyers and that she is ready to explore all legal means, local and international, to defend her name against corrupt and compromised persons.

It has become a pattern of behavior that each time Dr. Ngozi OKonjo-Iweala is internationally recognized, Governor Oshiomole and his cohorts embark on a cynical and devious ploy of trying to pull her down locally. Just last night, December 1st, Dr Okonjo-Iweala was honored at a high profile event attended by Vice President Joe Biden and former President Bill Clinton. Dr Okonjo Iweala was honored alongside Michael Bloomberg, Bill and Melinda Gates and Mo Ibrahim for their contributions to global development and humanity.

Gov Oshiomole and his cohorts should realize that their ill-motivated attempts to taint Dr Okonjo Iweala’s reputation will never succeed!

Paul Nwabuikwu
Media Adviser to Dr. Okonjo-Iweala

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Blaming the Biafra Agitators Instead of the Oppressors

0 0
Read Time:4 Minute, 24 Second

It is cowardly to blame the victims of murder by the Army and Police. Why do we live in a world where the victims are always blamed instead of the oppressors? Why do we live in the world where victims are always at the receiving end of the “blame-masters”?

When a woman is raped, the hypocritical and cowardly society of ours would not blame the disgusting rapist, but would blame the victim of rape. “What was she doing by that time of the night.?” “Why was she wearing a skimpy shorts or skimpy shirt.”? “Why did she go there in the first place.”?

When a little child is sexually abused or molested, instead of holding the stinking pedophile accountable, they would blame the poor little child. “Why did she go there alone.” “Why didn’t she shout for help.” bla bla bla. When a person gets robbed, instead of blaming the robbers, people would blame the victim. “You shouldn’t have carried that sum of money in your car.”

Why does our society make excuses for murderers in Army and Police uniforms and the shameless leaders that sent them to massacre peaceful protesters? Where in the Rules of Engagement does it say that you use a deadly weapon against a protesters that is neither armed nor threatened a law enforcement of military personnel? Only today, they shot dead about 8 people and injured scores of others. One of the victims was a young lady. What was their crimes? Because they called for freedom of Nnamdi Kanu from oppressive country called Nigeria.

The most annoying part of the whole thing is to see the so-called educated people and people that are supposedly enlightened, blaming the protesters instead of laying the blame on the over-zealous police and military men? Why do we have this notion that the high and mighty cannot be held to account for their misdeeds? The same people that would put Nelson Mandela’s picture in their profile would blame Nnamdi Kanu for agitating for self-government from Nigeria. The same people that would quote Martin Luther King Jr. would call Nnamdi Kanu and the Biafran agitators “charlatans”, “noise-makers”, “rouble-rosers”, “agitators” etc. They forgot that all these great leaders that we came to admire we once denigrated with labels like that. Moses was also called a murderer by his own people, that he was trying to liberate just because he asked a guilty party why he was fighting his own “brother”. “Do you want to kill me like you killed the Egyptian.”

Boko Haram declared a caliphate in the North East, and actually levied and are still levying war against Nigeria. They have killed over 15,000 civilians, killed hundreds of soldiers, burnt churches, raped women and young girls destroyed properties worth over billions of naira. But the army never over-powered them. In fact, the government is begging them to come to the table!

In developed world, you don’t negotiate with terrorists, period! But Nigeria is negotiating with them, releasing them from detention and asking them what they want. But agitators for self-government and the release of Nnamdi Kanu, who by the way is being detained for trump-up charges, even after a court of competent jurisdiction had ordered for his release 3 times; are being shot at for demonstrating against illegality, injustice and subjugation of a people by Hausa-Fulani oligarchy and their retinue of their lackeys and cronies.

These agitators had been pushed to the wall many times by the police and the army. No one has monopoly of violence. These law enforcement officers’ acts are provocative. They have taken too much for the owner not to notice. When these harmless agitators get armed and violent too, the so-called peace-makers and the so-called “food is ready” Igbo leaders would take their shameful heads out of the sand and do something.

The brute force of these empty skulls in uniform must be condemned by any decent society. I thought that the best way to press for your demands from your oppressor is through non-violent protest as the Biafran agitators had done. Everyone has a right to assembly and has a right to free speech.

The Biafran agitators must be commended for their discipline, organizational skills, persistence and fearlessness in the face of extreme danger. They denied themselves of the comfort of the arm-chair, enjoyed by even most of us subjugated people of Nigeria. They task themselves, organize, spend their own money for transport, food, telephone credits etc; camp out at the Niger Bridge all night, marched, sang, drummed and danced for Biafrans all over the world to be free. The least that we Igbos and other ethnic minorities that are equally victims of Nigeria; owe them is our support and our understandings. Even when we cannot do anything to support them, or do not buy into their methods, we should all desist from disparaging them by tacitly supporting the same evil men that should be thrown in jail.

Blood of the victims are in the heads of these blood suckers! Their own families must suffer for this senseless killings of innocent unarmed agitators. Any man that sheds the blood of the innocent, must live to face the Karma of his acts.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Don’t Force Them to Stay in Nigeria – Senator Yerima Supports Biafria

0 0
Read Time:40 Second

Former governor of Zamfara State, Senator Ahmad Sani Yerima on Tuesday said that the struggle for the actualization of Biafra was a legitimate cause.

Addressing newsmen in Abuja, Yerima said it was wrong for people to classify the agitators who have been campaigning for the revival of the defunct Republic of Biafra as secessionist because they have legitimate rights under the Nigerian Constitution to express their views on any issue; DAILY TIMES reports.

”These are people that want self determination. They believe that they are homogeneous in terms of tribe, language and culture and they want to live together and have their own community. In the end, you see, this is politics. I don’t believe in using force to make them succumb, submit or follow Nigeria and to stay in Nigeria”.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Does Igbo people hate themselves?

0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 53 Second

The Igbos hates themselves, really? I would make this as concise as possible, to enable many of you to read and digest it, full dose.

Do you know that the South-East region has one of the least amounts of federal presence? Howbeit, the Igbo people are the richest per capita of any ethnic group in Nigeria.

Dr. Magnus Kpakol, the former Director General of the National Poverty Eradication Programme (NAPEP), said that Anambra state has the highest number of entrepreneurs in the country. Anambra also has the highest number of affluent citizens per capita than any other indigenous people of any state in the country.

According to the Central Bank of Nigeria, after Lagos state, Anambra state has the highest number of Micro Finance Banks in Nigeria. See folks, the banks are not there to dance ‘Galala’ they are there because there is cash flow even in small towns.

Where are my going with all these, you may ask? Please read on, am about to make my point.

An article published in 2014 by Nigerian Insight titled “The rising rate of poverty in Nigeria” gave a detailed breakdown of poverty rate in Nigeria. The article reported that the North-West and the North-East had the highest poverty rates in the country in 2010 at 77.7% and 76.3% respectively. Yet, Northern Nigeria has produced 9 out of the 14 Presidents of Nigeria and has ruled the country for over 36 years of its 55 years of independence. Let us also add the fact that the North has the top richest men in Nigeria. Tell me, how much love is going around there?

Furthermore, in the same report by Nigerian Insight, Sokoto State had the highest poverty rate at 86.4 per cent. A previous report conducted by another daily about a decade ago in 2004 stated that Jigawa State had the highest poverty rate in Nigeria at 95%.

Why is there more prosperity per capita in the East than anywhere else in the country? The answer is simple. Igbo people know how to help themselves. The Igbos has perfected the system of apprenticeship, whereby the patriarch or the most successful person in the village or in the kindred would take some young men and sometimes women along with them to the city. They would live with them for some years. During the time they would spend with their ‘master’, they would be taught how to be successful in trade. After the agreed number of years, they would be settled with money and connections to start their own business.

Back in the days, when I visit the village I would ask, where is Okeke? Oh! He has gone to Lagos with his in-law.

Where is Okafor? He has gone to Port-Harcourt with his Uncle.

This is a typical trend in the South-East, one that is marked with love and the sincere desire to help one another to succeed. I wonder where the notion of hatred among Igbo people originated from.

As a young boy I used to be told the awful stories of how Biafra lost the Nigerian civil war because they were sabotaging themselves. They said the Igbos would lead the Nigerian military to the hideouts of the Biafran soldiers for a ‘piece of meal’. Until I grew up, I believed that narrative to be true. Of course, there might have been saboteurs in the Biafran camp (just like in any camp during warfare), but that was certainly not why Biafrans lost the war. I won’t go into it today.

Technically, considering the fact that the majority of the people killed by Boko Haram are from the North, can we say that the Hausa/Fulani hate themselves? How much love could possibly be in the city of the Caliphate, Sokoto with poverty rate at 86.4 percent?

The illegal oil bunkering and refineries in the South-South are perpetrated by mostly Ijaw people. So can we say that the Ijaws hate themselves? Many Ijaw people reading this would disagree! Same goes for other parts of the country.

According to the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) , it is most likely for most whites to be killed by whites, and most blacks to be killed by blacks. The obvious reason for this is that most people are killed by someone they know and most people are related to and live near people who are of the same race as themselves.

Hate is hate everywhere and love is love everywhere. Hate and love knows no racial or religious orientation. It knows no boundaries.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Bukola Saraki and the ‘Politics’ of Politics

0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 57 Second

However removed anyone chooses to be from the eccentricity of Nigeria’s political system, we eventually all get involved at the end of the day. From the cab man who drives around the city narrating his ordeal about how he managed to fuel his car, to the blacksmith who has to send money to his son in the North, we all eventually find ourselves discussing politics and governance –all within the horizon and privy of the information we can gather and digest.

So far, with what I have been able to digest regarding the case of the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, at the Code of Conduct Tribunal, I believe that all Nigerians need to put some deep thought into it. At this time when everyone sees what the papers are reporting at face value, I feel the need to comment on this because looking beyond what the ordinary, and leaving all issues of bitterness and slandering and jargon about past acts, there is a certain disturbing undertone to the Senate President’s case.

The public opinion court, which draws its judges and jury from social and traditional media, has tried to analyze and over-analyze the ongoing trial of Saraki based on news and stories we read day in day out. Some have said that Saraki has questions to answer before the court, and as such, he should clear his name. However, every Nigerian out there who has attained puberty would agree with me that there is something called ‘the politics of politics’ and Saraki, as a politician, is currently caught in the middle of a high-stakes game of this politics of politics.

Politics of politicking is usually beyond what the eyes can neither meet, nor words can explain. Therefore it is usually an art of the mind only understood by those who can discern beyond the common, and grasp at the hidden insinuations that lie hidden between the lines. Among the questions begging to be unraveled are: why would the Senators and House of Representative members who are the rightful representatives of the Nigerian masses keep standing firm in support for the Senate President?

These representatives are in no doubt the ambassadors of all the men and women across Nigeria, and as seemingly indicting as the CCT case against Saraki is, they have all maintained one solid ground that the CCT is persecuting the Senate President rather than prosecuting him.

A handful of Senators have even gone as far as issuing statements stating clearly that they believe that the case against Saraki is nothing but a political witchunt. If those closer to the corridors of power are saying this based on ‘in-house’ information, what should this signify to the rest of us who think that the ‘face-value representation’ of Saraki’s case at the CCT is as straightforward as it seem?

Another question to ask is: who stands to benefit from Saraki’s downfall, and who stands to lose? Is this not another clear case of the masses being used by a powerful cabal that is hell-bent on using the media to tilt national issues in their favour?

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that some guy called Martin Luther King once said that “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” In this regard, no matter how good the intentions of our President might be, we need to remind him that two wrongs can never make a right. Most importantly he is not a god to use the machineries of the state to decide who is tried and who is left alone. Or who deserves to preside over the legislature, and who should not. This is a democracy.

Some say that the President’s body language does not support corruption. I cry folly. Weren’t members of the President’s own cabinet like Fashola, Amaechi, and Fayemi accused of wrong doings? Why is the President shielding some people from being investigation and being selective in his role as the Chief Security Officer of the Federal Republic of Nigeria?

We all understand that politics is a game for the lionhearted, however, this game should not be played at the detriment to Nigeria’s democratic principles. The law should not be used to favour some and shield others. The law should also not be used as a weapon against those one considers enemies, and a safeguard for those one holds close as friends. The law must be equal, all the time. Regardless of who is being tried, no matter what his alleged sins are.

For this reason, I say: the case against Saraki is politically motivated.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %