It’s time to pause and decide Nigeria’s future – Iwuanyanwu

0 0
Read Time:11 Minute, 8 Second

Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu, politician, industrialist and publisher of Champion Newspapers, is a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)

What is your thought on Nigeria as a nation?

Frankly speaking, I don’t believe that when Lord Luggard  amalgamated the North and South he had the intention of establishing a nation based on unity, love and prosperity.

I think Luggard only did that for the convenience of the British Trading Company that employed him. He was just a staff of the company and of course he made every effort to maximize profit and the bigger the profit he made, the more he pleased his masters.

In the history of mankind, God at times takes a very simple action which he turns into a very serious situation. That action, which was very simply taken by Luggard has been able to transform into one of the strongest countries of the world.  I think Nigeria, as it is today, is one of the strongest countries in the world. Nigeria is endowed enormously with potentials.

Our diversity means that Nigeria has got everything that God can give to a people in this world. And if Nigerians have a government, if Nigerians decide to harness these resources, we will be able to build a country, which no nation in the world can overtake in any situation.

What is your take on calls for national conference? 

President Goodluck Jonathan has been very kind and generous to Nigerians and by next year, we will be 100 years as a nation.

In the life of a people, there comes a time, when the people pause for a while, to reflect on the past, examine the present situation and then decide the future. I think for Nigeria, the time is now.

Over the years, the history is clear and we know how we fought for our independence and got it in 1960. Soon, after that, we went into an unfortunate civil war.

And of course, that civil war was a major set-back to Nigeria but in spite of the civil war, we still remain strong.  Very few countries will come out of a very serious civil war and still stand to day as a very strong nation, respected all over the world.

Do you have faith in this nation?

I have faith in this country; I believe that Nigerians should do everything humanly possible to preserve the entity. There is not part of Nigeria that has not got tremendous natural potentials.

Some of them are being tapped today; some of them will be tapped in future. There is no part of Nigeria that has not got human resources that are needed for the development of the people, but what I want in Nigeria is actually honesty of purpose.

Now, I will start off from the political angle: in any country like Nigeria or republic, Nigeria is not obviously a nation, it comprises nation states.

That Lord Luggard by force amalgamated Nigeria does not necessarily mean that Nigerians have essentially agreed to be together but we have learnt over the years to live together and we are ready to live together. I think one thing that makes the country survive more than anything is for the people to be fair to one another.

Federal Character is very important. One issue that creates problem in this country is the office of the President of this country.

Nigerians over the years, throughout our experimentation on how to govern ourselves, started with three regions, we came to four regions. We had 12 states and today we have 36 states and Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Now, in our constitution, there is a clear policy of Federal Character. This is very important.

This is being applied in many areas. Nigerians must make sure that the Presidency of this country reflects Federal character. Nigeria is not the first country to do that. Switzerland, America and many other countries do it. We have now six geo-political zones. Every geo-political zone can produce a president.

I don’t see why Nigerians can’t be bold enough to put rotation of the presidency in the constitution among the six geo-political zones.

That will reduce acrimony and rancour that characterise the polity. Nigerians must work it out.

This is very important because every part of this country needs to have a sense of belonging.

If we don’t have a Federal Character and it is left to the whims and caprices of some people that don’t have the efficiency or capability, then it means that the weak will continue to be weak and the poor will continue to be poor and that will not be good for this country.

For example, everyday, you see people from the South East clamouring for Igbo Presidency and I feel that they are right because they know that their forebears like Zik played a frontline role in securing the Nigerian independence. South East also knows that their men and women are all over this country playing major roles in shaping the country’s destiny, socially, economically and otherwise.

So, they think that they deserve to be given the power but without zoning, it may probably be very difficult for people in their type of structure to achieve that. That is why, I think we must be bold enough to put this in the constitution.

In clear terms, does that mean you support  Sovereign National Conference?

At first, I was not supporting it, but now, I support. I support it because I have seen that the National Assembly that is supposed to do this job is not able to do it.

Why do you think it is very important?

It is very important because we must examine the structure of this country now to ensure we have a country we can manage with our resources. For example, we have to look at the legislative structure in this country. The Central Bank Governor has always said that the National Assembly is very large and spends so much money.

This country spends so much on overhead and this is not good for any country. We are living in a country where most school leavers, instead of going to look for jobs in productive areas, are seeking to be political aids.  This is so because we are spending a lot of money on overheads.

Are you saying it is good for us to practice a unicameral legislature? 

No, I am not saying that. Nigerians should sit back and reflect whether we need a full-time Senate and a full-time House of Representatives.

Most of the time, they overlap in their functions. What the House of Reps does is often repeated by the Senate. These are the issues that must be examined by Nigerians because America may be able to afford it, but Nigeria at this level of our economy cannot afford it.

The fact remains that the overhead of this country is so high and has become serious problem and is affecting the youths. There is a serious unemployment in this country.  It is affecting development. Part of it is that private sector is very weak. When you have a country that is spending so much on overhead, the capital money generated by the private sector is reduced and the private sector is weak and can’t generate jobs.

Everybody, who leaves university today, is looking for job in one government agency or parastatal. It never used to be so.  It is not so in America or Britain. A normal brilliant graduate from Harvard is not looking for a job in the state department.  He is looking for a job in a company. But here, our own people, everybody is looking for job in a ministry, where they feel their jobs will be secured.

Sir,  would you recommend physical federalism under  which states control their resources and pay some portion as their contribution to the centre? 

I don’t want to speak about that. I want the Nigerian state to decide what to do. But going to this national conference, after 100 years. These are our experiences.  Nigerians have had it all and must use their experiences to  bring a new constitution that will be able to guide the nation on the path of growth.

Any constitution we bring today must be able to create a situation, where the youth will have the opportunity to get jobs.

I believe that every nation, owes every citizen a right to earn a living. That is why every government owes every citizen, a right and opportunity to earn a living honestly and that is not done in this country. The private sector must be empowered.

The other issue that has been a problem for this country and which requires to be tackled very seriously is corruption. I believe that it is corruption. A typical American governor is voted to go and serve without giving bribe. In their culture, there is integrity. He was not voted to go and make money.

Here, we have seen that over the years, when governors leave office, the EFCC will be going after them to recover monies he stole.

You will see a person who was a governor of a state, before he became a governor,  he had only one house but at the end of his tenure, he has a house in Abuja, he has a house in Lagos, he has a house in Dubai, he has a house in America of London and so many other places. In addition, he has investment in so many businesses.

 How can this be effectively addressed? 

Only government cannot address this. The fact is that every government that comes, talk about corruption, but when they leave, we see in the trail of their job very nasty size of corruption. Take for example, the stealing of oil.

This government has virtually actually stopped it. And I think, that is a major achievement of this government. I think Nigerians should stop blaming government for this corruption, they should blame politicians. Everybody must be involved. If you have somebody, who before he became a public servant that suddenly became rich, and we keep quiet. Is it the government that will do it?

In their religious places like churches, they are knighted because they have stolen public fund. In some ceremonies, they are giving recognition and people say they are doing well.

People who stole public money must be made outcasts, so that people will know that it is a bad thing.  

This attitude must completely be eroded. It is a problem that must involve everybody in working for the solution. I think we require a moral reorientation and moral transformation by everybody.

Even in the universities, where students buy degrees, where people ask for favour from women to get degree. The stories are very nasty. I hope they are all not correct. But the stories are bad and people now see that the quality of education has gone down drastically.

You are a top member of the ruling Peoples’ Democratic Party, what do you think is the most important key to the issue of reconciling your members? 

I am not blaming anybody who has an issue to raise but PDP as a party has a constitution. Bamanga Tukur was elected in a very transparent election. Most of these governors were there when he was elected. He has been there for nearly two years.

None of them raised these issues, when he was elected. Now, if there are issues against him, I don’t know, I have not investigated. There is a constitutional process to follow in resolving issues, if they are actually working to protect the party.

They should raise the issue within the laws of the party, but what they are doing today, is to destroy the party and may be to form another party. Otherwise, if they actually have facts, they should constitutional process to remove him. And I am quite sure that they are very powerful, if they actually have facts, but it is not easy.

I have heard some of them giving conditions to the President that he must remove the party Chairman. The president of Nigeria has no power to remove any party Chairman, who was duly elected.

So, anybody, who is telling the President that the only condition to support him is to remove an elected Party Chairman, is not actually being fair to the President because he has no such powers. The Chairman was elected; everybody watched the election in a transparent election. Even those, whose elections had flaws, went back in the last convention to be re-elected .

Most of these people who are giving these conditions are founding members of the party and people who have made contributions to the party. I think that they should be able to work hard to make sure that the party does not disintegrate. Some of them became what they are today, even governors through the party.  They should come back to the party and raise these issues through the constitution of the party. Telling the president to remove the party Chairman is not possible.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Lay down your arms, ACF begs Boko Haram

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 39 Second

KADUNA—The Arewa Consultative Forum, ACF, has again asked the Boko Haram insurgents to lay down their arms and embrace peace, saying that although the country was experiencing hard times, the situation was not bad enough for some people to lose the will to live in the mistaken belief that it is better to die but not alone.

The ACF made this known in its goodwill message to mark the nation’s 53 Indepence anniversary.

The statement entitled, “ACF felicitates with people and government of Nigeria on the occasion of the 53rd Independence,”’ and signed by the National Publicity Secretary of the forum, Mr. Anthony Sani reads in part: “Nigerians have reasons to celebrate because the Independence gives freedom for Nigeria to take its destiny into its hands by determining the content, shape, direction and pace of its socio economic development needed for national solidarity and welfare of all.

“There is no doubt that the nation is experiencing hard times. But Nigerians should not allow these challenges to set their national agenda.

‘’On the contrary, difficult times should bring about national grandeur, purposeful leadership and the best in every one. More so, that no nation thrives on victory of its faction but through ultimate reconciliation which is not act of cowardice but of patriotic courage,and even heroism.

“Building a country inhabited by people who are socially diverse, economically empowered and politically active demands consciously directed efforts to make what we desire as a collective possible and then actual.

‘’One way of starting this journey is for Nigerians to make judicious use of their democratic rights and ensure that their votes count so that the emerging leaders would be accountable and make poverty history.”

To that end, those who relish in employment of violence to solve their perceived concerns should have known by now that such approaches do not solve problems. And so,ACF urges them to lay down their arms and embrace civilized ways of doing things.”
’’It may well be true that corruption has stolen the empowerment, the opportunity and the future of most Nigerians,which have made some people to lose the will to live in the mistaken belief that it is better to die but not alone.

’’But corruption can thrive only in a corrupt society which glorifies riches which sources are unknown.And so,it is not correct for some people to lose their will to live,worse by taking their lives and those of others along.This is a wrong headed approach to solving problems.

Surely,our problems are not beyond redemption.After all,adversity can be cathartic and constructive as well.

’’That is why ACF appeals to all Nigerians to use this occasion and resolve to live up the concept of a nation by coming together and unleash their synergy against our common challenges for public good. This is because the task of overcoming national challenges is a collective responsibility and not for the government alone. In that way,we can make Nigeria feel young again with promise of glory days ahead.’’

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

2015 Presidency, Nigerians To Determine – S-East, S-South govs

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 56 Second

Governors of the South East and South South states, yesterday, in Enugu, declared that the determination of who will be the President of the country in 2015 would be made by the Nigerian electorate, in line with democratic tenets, warning that the power of the people should not be usurped by any group or individuals.

The governors, who met at the Government House, Enugu, in a communique issued at the end of the meeting, also thanked Nigerians for their continued support of President Jonathan’s administration and urged the President to remain focussed on governance and not to allow himself to be distracted.

 

MEETING—From left: Governors Theodore Orji (Abia), Emmanuel Uduaghan (Delta), Sullivan Chime (Enugu), Martin Elechi (Ebonyi), Peter Obi (Anambra), Liyel Imoke (Cross River), Godswill Akpabio, Akwa Ibom state and Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State, Rear Admiral John Jonah (rtd) at the South East/S-South Governors meeting at Government House, Enugu, yesterday.

Call for continued dialogue

They further called for continued dialogue at resolving national issues and management of the security situation in the country to guarantee the continued corporate existence of the nation.

They also commended the security agencies for their efforts in managing the challenges, while lauding the federal government for the massive reduction in crude oil theft.

On ASUU

The governors called on the leadership of ASUU and other players to be sensitive to the plight of students and call off the strike while resolving issues through dialogue.

The governors further resolved to continue to strengthen economic ties among their states and to continue to pursue the development of the zones as well as prosecute the various infrastructure projects earlier identified.
The communique read: “The SouthSouth/South East Governors met in Enugu on the 29th day of September to deliberate over issues affecting the Zones and the nation in general.

“After extensive cordial deliberations, the governors of the South South/South East zones resolved to continue to pursue the development of the zones as well as prosecute the various infrastructure projects identified.
“We thank Nigerians for their continued support for the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan who they elected overwhelmingly.

“We urge Mr. President to remain focused on governance and not to allow himself to be distracted.

2015

“We note that the determination of who will be President of this country in 2015 will be made by the Nigerian electorate in line with democratic tenets and the power of the people should not be usurped by any group or individuals.

“We call for continued dialogue at resolving national issues and the management of the security situation in the country to guarantee the continued corporate existence of our great nation.

“We commend the security agencies for their efforts in managing these challenges and commend the federal government for the massive reduction in crude oil theft.

“We call on the leadership of ASUU and other players to be sensitive to the plight of our children and call off the strike while resolving issues through dialogue.

“Finally, as we celebrate our 53rd Independence anniversary, we felicitate with Mr. President and all Nigerians as we resolve to work for the peace and continuous stability of our great nation.”

Attendance

Governors in attendance at the meeting were Sullivan Chime (Enugu), Peter Obi (Anambra), Liyel Imoke (Cross River) Theodore Orji (Abia), Martin Elechi (Ebonyi) Dr. Emmanuel Uduaghan (Delta), Godswill Akapbio (Akwa Ibom) and Rear Admiral Gboribiogha John Jonah (rtd), Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

RE: Fashola and his “Apology”; I would never have apologised- By: Femi Fani-Kayode

0 0
Read Time:7 Minute, 17 Second

There can be little doubt that the relocation of the 19 igbo destitutes from Lagos state a few months ago was a lawful exercise and that it was done in the interest of Lagos state. Consequently I do not believe that Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola ought to have tendered any form of apology whatsoever to the igbo for what he did. The only redeeming factor is the fact that the apology was obviously designed simply to calm frayed nerves and I commend Fashola for that gesture if nothing else. I say this because my understFeanding is that he apologised NOT for the deportation itself but for ”the misunderstanding that arose from it”. There is a world of difference between the two.

I also commend him for admonishing the igbo to develop their own region and to decide whether they are ”igbo before they are Nigerians or Nigerians before they are igbo”. This is a fundamental question that I believe that we must all determine in our hearts and minds whether we are of igbo, yoruba, hausa/fulani or ijaw stock or anything else.

For the purposes of clarification the debate that has been raging in the land for the last two months, though sparked off by Fashola’s relocations, was more about the curious claim that Lagos state was ”no man’s land” which the igbo jointly own with the yoruba and which they had developed, and are indeed still developing, with their money and nothing else. It was that assertion, and not the plight of a handful of igbo destitues, that many of us from west of the River Niger took issue with. Fashola and others have said publiclly that it is ”absurd” and ”insulting” for anyone to call Lagos state ”no-man’s land” and that is good enough for me. As long as he did not apologise for saying that I have no problem with whatever he may or may not have said about the deportations even though, had I been governor, I would have handled it differently.

The truth is that the yoruba way is to apologise not only when you are wrong but also when you are right if you believe that the other party has been badly hurt by your actions. It is a generous and kind disposition which is borne out of the yoruba concept of the ”omoluwabi spirit”- a good heart and a clean spirit that desires, above all else, peace, joy and harmony. Yet to those from outside yorubaland that do not share that disposition, that do not understand that spirit and that cannot even begin to comprehend it, an apology is nothing less than an admission of guilt and wrong- doing and a trophy of triumph to those whom it is offered.

It is for this reason that I believe that it was wrong for Fashola to apologise and that it is important for us to consider the long term implications of what he has done. The truth is that in life perception counts for everything. And rightly or wrongly the perception that most people have, particularly amongst the igbo, is that Fashola has indeed apologised for the deportations. This perception is supported by misleading newspaper headlines which were drafted and written by journalists who did not bother to read the text or properly decipher the statement.

Whether anyone likes it or not this latest development is viewed as a great triumph for the hardline igbo nationalists and the Governor Peter Obi’s of this world who honestly believe that the igbo have some kind of special rights or special status in Lagos and indeed in yorubaland. They say and do things in Lagos and other parts of the west that they dare not do in the north and that they will never allow our people to do in the east.This is because they fear the northerners who have often put them in their place when they cross the line but they have nothing but contempt for us. Fashola has now given those within the igbo community that have this mindset far more legitimacy, strength and confidence.

In any case now that dishing out apologies is the order of the day and he has set the precedent, the question has to be asked- will Peter Obi take a cue from that, be a gentleman and apologise for deporting the people of Akwa Ibom from his Anambra state as well? Is Obi that reasonable or charitable? Do those that think like him believe trhat what is good for the goose is good for the gander? I doubt it very much. Again will Fashola apologise to the numerous northerners that he deported from Lagos as well and will he apologise to his yoruba kith and kin from Oyo and Osun for deporting them too? I really do wonder how far this new-found large-heartedness and seasonal expression of regrets will go? Will it be spread everywhere or is it exclusively reserved for the igbo?

More importantly, in the spirit of this new rapprochement, will Fashola secretly conceede portions of Lagos state and yorubaland to them as well? Will he take my dear egbon and former cabinet colleague, Senator Adeseye Ogunlewe’s counsel, and wholeheartedly accept the interesting notion that the igbo have ”married all our daughters” in idungaran and isale-eko and that we should therefore give all our land and territory to them? Will he give up the patrimony of his people all in the name of trying to appease the igbo and get their votes for the APC in the upcoming governorship election in Anambra state? If that is the plan I doubt that it will work because they are a pretty unforgiving lot. The more you give the more they will ask for and at the end of the day you will end up losing far more than you gain.

Governor Chris Ngige, who is an amiable gentleman and one of the most decent, accomodating, liberal, detribalised and civilised people that I know from the east, will gain nothing from this and sadly the person that will gain from it will be the hardline, igbocentric Peter Obi and his APGA candidate in november’s gubernatorial election in Anambra state. People like Fashola need to undersatand that sometimes in trying to play the generous statesman and the kind-hearted omoluwabi we end up being taken for granted and making fools of ourselves. You only apologise to those who will appreciate it, who do not necessarily see it as an admission of guilt and who will not misconstrue it as weakness. This is because the display of weakness by any leader, no matter how well-liked, only attracts impudence and aggression from those who have a hidden agenda. A word is enough for the wise.

If I were Governor of Lagos state I would never have apologised for the execution of a legitimate and lawful exercise which was absolutely necessary and which was done in the interests of my state and my people, no matter how many cows I had been offered or given by the kinsmen of those affected. What Fashola has done, albeit inadvertently, is to betray those amongst his yoruba kith and kin that stood by him and defended him when he took that historic and controversial decision to deport the igbo destitutes. He has also fuelled the erroneous impression that is held by most of the igbo that the yoruba people and their leaders are bumbling and inconsistent cowards that cannot stand firm when put under pressure and when faced with threats and hardship.

This is sad and unfortunate because that is not who or what we are. Though we cherish and often manifest the omoluwabi spirit, the yoruba are also a lion-hearted people- we are slow to anger but irresistable in battle. We are as constant as the northern star even though we are accomodating and generous. I have immense respect for Fashola and I happen to have a spoft spot for him but I believe that his behaviour is a clear u-turn and that it represents a double standard, a capitulation of values and a revocation of principle. You don’t apologise for government policy just to appease a certain group of people no matter how bellicose, violent, loud and aggressive they may be. It is better to lose a million elections outside yorubaland than to conceed even one inch of yoruba territory to those that seek to lay claim to that which is not theirs. A word is enough for the wise.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Families’ grief, questions linger after Yarnell report

0 0
Read Time:5 Minute, 53 Second
PRESCOTT, Ariz. — Dan Parker had walked the site on Yarnell Hill where 19 firefighters died, among them his son, Wade. He formed an image in his mind of what must have happened as the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew faced flames fueled by an erratic storm.
 
The Yarnell Hill Fire report released Saturday, almost three months after the disaster, helped resolve that image, confirming much of what Parker, a firefighter himself, suspected. It also affirmed his regard for the men his son served with, including the crew's two top leaders.
 
"I would send my son out with Eric Marsh and Jesse Steed tomorrow," said Parker, a captain with the Chino Valley Fire District. "In my eyes, those guys did nothing (wrong). And I don't have an issue. None whatsoever."
 
 
Families of the 19 fallen firefighters had their first opportunity to hear from fire investigators Saturday morning, just hours before the final report was posted online. State, federal and local officials answered questions in a briefing described as "gut-wrenching," a meeting tinged with anger and frustration, according to one of the officials.
 
The report did not accuse any of the hotshots of wrongdoing, but it left open questions about the final minutes before the crew deployed emergency shelters, a step taken when no other options remain. The document also gave details about what happened to each firefighter and his shelter, describing burned clothing and melted equipment.
 
David Turbyfill, the father of Travis Turbyfill, one of the 19 hotshots, said he believes the report shows two factors contributed most to the deaths: ineffective communication and inadequate fire shelters. He thinks the report should erase any doubts about the crew's final actions.
 
"This crew did not die out of fear," said Turbyfill. "They fought to the bitter end and did everything they were trained to do. They had to make the call to get into the shelters. Those shelters eventually let them down."
 
At the public news conference, Turbyfill and his wife, Shari, repeated their concerns about inadequate equipment and shelters. A state fire official promised to meet with them to discuss the issue.
 
"In the end, this is a lesson learned," Turbyfill said. "They will be studying it for years, and it will aid training. But the lesson is not worth the cost."
 
Tammy Misner, mother of hotshot Sean Misner, read parts of the report at the morning briefing and then tucked it away for the drive from Prescott back to Solvang, Calif. She's not sure if she will ever read it all.
 
"I was hoping that there would be some kind of closure, that there would just be some feeling that I could begin to let this rest. I didn't get the feeling that that was going to happen," said Misner.
 
She had believed that the men's deaths would have been mercifully fast, that they wouldn't have suffered or had much time to be afraid. The report confirmed that, saying the temperature would have hit 2,000 degrees rapidly.
 
"There is some comfort that it would have been over quickly. They didn't have time to be afraid; they were focusing on trying to save their lives, and they were close together," Misner said.
 
Yet even knowing all that, in the end, the report doesn't change anything.
 
"I will always miss my boy," Misner said. "That's the hard part."
 
Not all of the family members gathered for the briefing. Some relatives live out of state, while others said they were not prepared to relive the tragedy.
 
Jim Norris attended to learn more about what led to the death of his 28-year-old son, Scott Norris, who had been a hotshot for about five years. Karen Norris, Scott's mother, did not attend, "but neither of us has read the report yet, and I'm not ready to read it yet," she said.
 
Roxanne Warneke, the pregnant widow of hotshot Billy Warneke, attended the family briefing but had plans to attend an Arizona Diamondbacks game Saturday evening with her parents, brother-in-law Fred Warneke and mother-in-law, Kathie Purkey.
 
"We decided that we needed to do something fun," she said Thursday. She expected that reading the details of the report would be difficult.
 
"It will open up all of these wounds again, but it is important to know," Warneke said.
 
"There are so many questions that still need to be answered."
 
Parker said a team went through the report with the families step by step, from the first lightning strike and firefighters' initial attack through the fire's rapid spread.
 
"There was emotion, and there (were) tears shed," he said. "And I think everybody was just sitting back, anticipating hearing what they had to say."
 
At the high school, across a full parking lot crowded with TV satellite trucks, Annemarie Lopez watched her 13-year-old son play first base for the Prescott Badgers.
 
Lopez knew the fire report was due, but she didn't know it was Saturday.
 
People had been talking about the report's release for days, she said, anticipating that it might signal a return to normalcy. Because life has been anything but normal for the last three months.
 
"The fire was just so devastating, for the firefighters, for the families, for the community," Lopez said. "We'll never forget what happened, but it is beginning to feel like we are getting back to business a little bit."
 
Lopez was not sure what the report said, but she did know one thing.
 
"Prescott lost 19 men that day," she said. "No report is ever going to explain that."
 
Later in the morning, Parker reflected on the time since the fire.
 
"There's been times in the last three months when the wound has been reopened," he said. "And today was one of those days. Hopefully the healing process can begin. We've been doing that since day one. We've been trying to move forward and deal with the things that we had to do and the challenges we had to face.
 
"I know we're going to be OK," he said.
 
"It's just going to take some time. The beauty of it is that we have each other to lean on. And that's what we rely on."
 
Contributing: Karina Bland, Connie Cone Sexton and Richard Ruelas, The Arizona Republic; Kevin Kennedy, KPNX-TV, Phoenix

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

U.S. Mice, leaks, holes: 40% of metro homes have hazards

0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 6 Second
Mice, rats and water leaks are among the problems plaguing a rising number of inner-city and suburban homes, 40% of which now have at least one health or safety hazard, says a ranking to be released Monday of 45 U.S. metropolitan areas.
 
Harmed by the nation's foreclosure crisis and economic downtown, 35 million metro-area homes pose potential risks — up from 30 million (35%) in a similar report four years ago, according to the National Center for Healthy Housing, a non-profit research group.
 
"It's a worrisome trend," says Rebecca Morley, the Maryland-based group's executive director. She notes poor housing conditions have been linked to asthma, lead poisoning and cancer. She says the deterioration, however, is hardly surprising, because many foreclosed properties sat vacant for long periods, and people who struggled to make ends meet had less money for home maintenance.
 
The most common problem? Water leaks from the outside, which affected 11% of metro-area homes, followed by signs of mice (10%) interior water leaks (9%) as well as roofing problems, damaged interior walls and foundation problems (each 5%.)
 
Nationwide, rental properties have more problems than owner-occupied dwellings, and inner-city housing does worse than suburban apartments and homes. A big factor: age. Inner-city rentals are typically older.
 
The five metro areas that had the least problems — San Jose, Calif., Indianapolis, Anaheim-Santa Ana, Calif., Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla., and Phoenix — tend to have newer homes. The three with the least healthy housing conditions were San Antonio; Birmingham, Ala., and Memphis.
 
"The report documents that healthy homes remain elusive for far too many homeowners, renters and their children," Nicolas Retsinas, a housing expert at Harvard Business School, said in a statement.
 
The scorecard is based on 20 health-related housing characteristics in the Census Bureau's American Housing Survey. The list also includes rats, peeling paint, holes in walls and broken toilets. The Census surveys were done between 2004 and 2011.
 
In December, Morley says, her group will release the National Healthy Housing Standard, which local jurisdictions can adopt as a property maintenance code. She says such codes make a difference, adding that Department of Housing and Urban Development properties have codes and are often in better condition than similar non-HUD housing.
 
Metro areas (including suburbs) with healthiest housing
 
1 San Jose
 
2 Indianapolis
 
3 Anaheim-Santa Ana (Orange County), Calif.
 
3 Tampa-Saint Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla.
 
3 Phoenix
 
6 Sacramento
 
6 San Bernardino-Riverside, Calif.
 
6 Miami-Hialeah, Fla.
 
6 Minneapolis-Saint Paul
 
10 Charlotte, N.C.-S.C.
 
10 New York area
 
12 Milwaukee
 
12 Atlanta
 
12 San Diego
 
12 Seattle
 
16 Columbus, Ohio
 
16 Washington, D.C.-Md.-Va.
 
16 San Francisco
 
16 Saint Louis, Mo.-Ill.
 
16 Portland, Ore.-Wash.
 
16 Oakland
 
22 Cleveland
 
22 Northern New Jersey area
 
24 Denver
 
24 Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas
 
24 Hartford, Conn.
 
24 Norfolk-Virginia Beach
 
24 Pittsburgh
 
29 Chicago
 
30 Providence
 
30 Kansas City, Mo.-Kan.
 
32 New Orleans
 
32 Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind.
 
34 Buffalo
 
34 Baltimore
 
34 Los Angeles-Long Beach
 
37 Boston
 
37 Dallas
 
39 Detroit
 
39 Houston
 
39 Philadelphia, Pa.-N.J.
 
42 Oklahoma City
 
43 San Antonio
 
44 Birmingham, Ala.
 
45 Memphis, Tenn.-Ark.-Miss.
 
Source: National Center for Healthy Housing, based on U.S. Census data

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

U.S. 66 questions and answers about the government shutdown

0 0
Read Time:14 Minute, 33 Second
WASHINGTON — It's been 17 years since the federal government last faced a partial shutdown because Congress and the president couldn't agree on a spending bill. A lot has changed in that time, leaving federal employees, citizens and even government decision-makers confused about what a shutdown would mean.
 
Every shutdown is different. The politics that cause them are different. Because of technology and structural overhauls, the way the government functions has changed since 1996. Much of what will happen is unknown.
 
Here's what we do know about Tuesday's looming shutdown:
 
THE BASICS
 
1. What causes a shutdown? Under the Constitution, Congress must pass laws to spend money. If Congress can't agree on a spending bill — or if, in the case of the Clinton-era shutdowns, the president vetoes it — the government does not have the legal authority to spend money.
 
2. What's a continuing resolution? Congress used to spend money by passing a budget first, then 12 separate appropriations bills. That process has broken down, and Congress uses a stopgap continuing resolution, or CR, that maintains spending at current levels for all or part of the year.
 
3. Why can't Congress agree? The Republican-controlled House has passed a spending bill that maintains spending levels but does not provide funding to implement the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. The Democratic Senate insists that the program be fully funded and that Congress pass what they call a "clean" CR.
 
4. What is a "clean" CR? A continuing resolution without policy changes.
 
5. Why is this happening now? The government runs on a fiscal year from Oct. 1 to Sept. 30. Shutdowns can happen at other times of the year when Congress passes a partial-year spending bill.
 
6. Could government agencies ignore the shutdown? Under a federal law known as the Anti-Deficiency Act, it can be a felony to spend taxpayer money without an appropriation from Congress.
 
7. When would a shutdown begin? When the fiscal year ends at midnight Monday. Most federal workers would report to work Tuesday, but unless they're deemed "essential," they would work no more than four hours on shutdown-related activities before being furloughed.
 
8. When would the shutdown end? Immediately after the president signs a spending bill. As a practical matter, it could be noon the following day before most government offices that were shut down would reopen their doors.
 
9. How many times has the government shut down in the past? Since 1977, there have been 17 shutdowns, according to the Congressional Research Service.
 
10. How long do shutdowns usually last? Most last no more than three days. Some last less than a day.
 
11. When was the longest shutdown in history? The longest was also the most recent: from Dec. 16, 1995, through Jan. 5, 1996. That's 21 days.
 
12. Would this shutdown be different from those in the 1990s? Yes. When the 1995 shutdown started, Congress had already passed three of 13 appropriations bills. (They funded military construction, agriculture, and energy and water projects.) Also, more government services are automated.
 
THE DEBT LIMIT
 
13. What's the difference between a shutdown and a debt crisis? In a shutdown, the government lacks the legal authority to spend money on non-essential services. In a debt crisis, the government is mandated to spend money — but doesn't have the legal authority to borrow the money to spend it.
 
14. Are the two related? Only by timing, which is somewhat coincidental.
 
15. When will the government run out of borrowing authority? Secretary of the Treasury Jacob Lew says it could come as soon as Oct. 17.
 
16. Has the United States ever defaulted on its debt before? No.
 
17. If the nation hits the debt limit, will government shut down? That's a big unknown question. The Treasury Department has said the most likely scenario is that it would delay payments, paying only those bills it can afford, using daily tax revenue.
 
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
 
18. Will I still get my mail? Yes. The U.S. Postal Service functions as an independent business unit.
 
19. Can I get a passport? Maybe, but hurry. The Department of State says it has some funds outside the annual congressional appropriation. "Consular operations domestically and overseas will remain 100% operational as long as there are sufficient fees to support operations," the department says.
 
20. Can I visit national parks? No. The National Park Service says day visitors will be told to leave immediately, and entrances will be closed.
 
21. What about campers already in the parks? They will be given two days to leave.
 
22. Will Washington museums be open? The Smithsonian, the National Zoo and the Holocaust Museum would all be closed. Private museums, such as the Newseum, the Spy Museum and Mount Vernon, would remain open. Rule of thumb: If it's usually free, it's probably closed.
 
23. What about the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts? The Kennedy Center does receive an annual appropriation from Congress, but also runs on ticket revenue and endowment funds. The center expects to stay open through a shutdown.
 
24. What about the National Archives?All archives and most presidential libraries will be closed, unless they're operated by a private foundation — as all pre-Herbert Hoover presidential museums are. The Federal Records Center Program, which supports other agencies, would continue to operate because it uses a revolving fund.
 
25. Will the District of Columbia shut down? The district does not have complete autonomy and relies on an appropriation from Congress to operate. So during the shutdowns in the 1990s, trash went uncollected, and many city departments closed. In a departure from past shutdowns, Mayor Vincent Gray has informed the Office of Management and Budget that he has deemed all city employees "essential." The district's own attorney general has declared the mayor's plan illegal.
 
26. Will the Patent and Trademark Office be open? Yes. The office can continue to operate off user fees and other funds for at least four weeks before having to shut down.
 
27. Would food safety inspections continue? Mostly. The Food Safety and Inspection Service would continue all safety-related activities. The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration would continue inspections to the extent they're paid by user fees, "but inability to investigate alleged violations could hamper corrective action in the long term and could have an immediate impact on members of industry." The Food and Drug Administration would limit its activities but continue to monitor recalls and conduct investigations.
 
28. Will the government still release economic data? Probably. The weekly unemployment claims number would still come out, and the September jobs report, due out Friday, probably will, too. The Department of Commerce reasons that some of its data is so economically sensitive that delaying it risks that it will be leaked.
 
29. Would the government continue to enforce wage and hour laws? The laws will still be in effect, but the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division would suspend operations.
 
30. Will disaster response be affected? No. However, all "non-disaster" grants — such as state and local preparedness programs — would be postponed, the Department of Homeland Security says.
 
31. Will e-Verify be affected? Yes. The government system to allow companies to voluntarily check the legal work status of its employees would be shut down.
 
STORY: Blame game for impending shutdown
 
GOVERNMENT BENEFITS
 
32. Would a shutdown put the brakes on implementing the Affordable Care Act, or "Obamacare?" No. The state-run exchanges for the uninsured would open as scheduled Tuesday. "The marketplaces will be open on Tuesday, no matter what, even if there is a government shutdown," President Obama said Friday.
 
33. Why not? Like Social Security or Medicaid, Obamacare is a permanent entitlement that isn't subject to annual funding by Congress. "Many of the core parts of the health care law are funded through mandatory appropriations and wouldn't be affected," Gary Cohen, the Health and Human Services Department official overseeing the health care rollout, said last week.
 
34. Would seniors continue to get Social Security benefits? Yes. Social Security is a mandatory spending program, and the people who send those checks would continue to work under a legal doctrine called "necessary implication."
 
35. Can I apply for Social Security benefits, appeal a denial of benefits, change my address or sign up for direct deposit?Yes.
 
36. Can I get a new or replacement Social Security card, benefit verification statement or earnings record correction?No.
 
37. Would the government continue to pay unemployment benefits? Yes. The Employment and Training Administration "will continue to provide essential functions, as occurred during the shutdown of 1995," according to the Department of Labor contingency plan.
 
38. Will I be able to get food stamps? Yes. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is funded through the Recovery Act and from funds that don't expire for another year, the U.S. Department of Agriculture says.
 
39. What about WIC?No money would be available to pay the administrative costs of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children. But because it's administered by states, there may be state funds available.
 
40. And the federal school lunch program? Schools are reimbursed for these costs on a monthly basis and are allowed to carry over funds from the previous fiscal year. The USDA expects most schools will be able to continue providing meals through October.
 
41. What will happen to veterans receiving compensation for service- or combat-related wounds and injuries? The Department of Veterans Affairs said if the shutdown continues into late October, it will run out of money for compensation and pension checks to more than 3.6 million veterans who rely on the money to support themselves.
 
42. Can I still get a federally backed loan? Maybe not. "Federal loans for rural communities, small business owners, families buying a home will be frozen," President Obama said Friday.
 
43. Does that mean I can't get an FHA mortgage? No. The Federal Housing Administration says it "will endorse new loans under current multi-year appropriation authority in order to support the health and stability of the U.S. mortgage market."
 
44. Does that mean I can't get a VA mortgage? No. The Department of Veterans Affairs says loans are funded via user fees and should continue. However, during the last shutdown, "loan Guaranty certificates of eligibility and certificates of reasonable value were delayed."
 
45. Will deceased veterans still be able to get a burial benefit? Yes. Burial benefits, headstones and death notices will still be available.
 
TAXES
 
46. Would the IRS continue to collect taxes? Yes. All payments would be processed. More than 12 million people have requested an extension on their 2012 taxes, which expires Oct. 15.
 
47. Will my refund be delayed? Possibly, especially if the taxpayer files a paper return.
 
48. What about taxpayer assistance? Walk-in assistance centers and telephone hotlines would be closed.
 
49. I'm being audited by the IRS. Would a shutdown affect me? Yes. The IRS will suspend all audit activities.
 
EMPLOYMENT
 
50. How many federal employees would be furloughed? The government has not given an official estimate.
 
51. Does anyone have a guess? J. David Cox, president of the American Federation of Government employees, said he expects the number will be 800,000 to 1 million, out of 2.1 million federal employees. That's consistent with a USA TODAY analysis of 2011 shutdown contingency plans, which found that 59% of non-defense government employees would continue to work.
 
52. Why do some federal employees continue to work during a shutdown? The law — or at least, the Justice Department's interpretation of it — contains exemptions for several classes of employees: The biggest exemption is for employees necessary to protect public health, safety or property. But property could include government data, ongoing research experiments or other intangibles. Political appointees are exempt because they cannot be placed on leave by law. Employees necessary for the president to carry out his constitutional responsibilities are exempt. Finally, employees whose salaries are paid from sources outside an annual spending bill can still get paid and report to work.
 
53. Who decides which employees work and which go home? Each agency is responsible for coming up with its own contingency plan, based on guidance from the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management. Those plans are then sent to the White House for review.
 
54. Would the president be paid during a shutdown? Yes. The president's $400,000 salary is mandatory spending. If furloughs begin to affect the government's ability to process payroll, his paycheck could be delayed.
 
55. What about White House staff? Some high-ranking presidential appointees are exempt from the Annual and Sick Leave Act of 1951, which means they can essentially be made to work unpaid overtime. Also, any employee necessary for the president to carry out his constitutional duties would be exempt.
 
56. And the president's personal aides? The White House has 90 staffers who work in the residence. During a shutdown, 15 of them would stay on the job.
 
57. Would Congress continue to be paid during a shutdown? Yes. The 27th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1992, holds that "No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened." Intended to prevent Congress from voting itself a raise, it also protects members from a pay cut.
 
58. What about congressional staff? Like other federal employees, they would be deemed essential or non-essential. Essential staff would include those necessary to carry out constitutional responsibilities, such as the parliamentarians, or for protection of members, such as the sergeants-at-arms. Staff of the appropriations committees may also be needed to write the law that would end the shutdown.
 
59. Would active-duty military be furloughed? No. All active-duty military are essential and should report as scheduled Tuesday, the Department of Defense said Friday.
 
60. Will civilian defense workers be furloughed? About half of them, or about 400,000, will be sent home, according to the Defense Department's contingency plan.
 
61. Would active-duty military be paid during a shutdown? If a shutdown lasts longer than a week, the Pentagon might not be able to process its payroll in time for the Oct. 15 paychecks, Defense Department Comptroller Robert Hale said Friday. The House passed a separate bill early Sunday that would appropriate money for active-duty and reserve paychecks regardless of the shutdown — and also pay for support services to make sure they get paid. That bill passed the House 422-0, but still must go to the Senate.
 
62. Could federal employees simply volunteer their services? No. A 19th-century federal law forbids volunteers because the government doesn't want them filing claims for back pay after the shutdown is over, according to a legal analysis by Washington attorney Raymond Natter.
 
63. Would federal employees get paid retroactively, even if they didn't work? Maybe. Congress granted retroactive pay to furloughed workers after the shutdowns of the mid-1990s, but that wouldn't necessarily happen again. "I believe this time is going to be much different. This is a much different Congress than the 1995 Congress," said Cox, federal employee union president. "I'm not sure that they'd even want to go back and pay the people who worked."
 
THE LONG TERM
 
64. How much money would a shutdown save taxpayers? Most likely, it wouldn't. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says shutdowns cost money in terms of contingency planning, lost user fees and back pay. A government estimate after the shutdown in 1995-96 estimated its cost at $1.4 billion.
 
65. What effect would a shutdown have on the economy? Economists say even a short shutdown — of three or four days — would begin to shave decimal points off economic growth. A sustained shutdown of three or four weeks "would do significant economic damage," economist Mark Zandi told USA TODAY.
 
66. What about the stock market? The Standard & Poor's 500 fell 3.7% during the 1995-96 government shutdown, according to S&P Capital IQ. Stocks quickly rebounded after the government got back to work, rising 10.5% the month after the shutdown ended.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

U.S. Disbelief turns to reality in Wis. bridge closure

0 0
Read Time:4 Minute, 40 Second
GREEN BAY, Wis. — In the dark of night, a truck driver heading across the Interstate 43 bridge across the Fox River felt something strange on the road underneath his rig.
 
So strange that he reached for his cellphone and dialed 911.
 
When the trucker reported that the pavement on the Leo Frigo Memorial Bridge seemed to be sagging Wednesday morning, the police dispatcher either could not understand what he said — or could not believe it.
 
"Sagging?" she asked.
 
The trucker repeated himself and urged the dispatcher to take action.
 
"I would suggest," he said, "that someone go out there and at least take a look at it."
 
It was 3:43 a.m.
 
After being dispatched to the bridge to investigate, a Green Bay, Wis., police officer reported about 10 minutes later that nothing appeared unusual. The officer told the dispatcher: "Bridge appears to be intact and not sagging. No apparent damage to bridge," records say.
 
It would be almost another hour before police officers realized that the 120-foot-tall bridge had, in fact, sagged and that the four-lane interstate highway should be shut down.
 
Police Lt. Jeff Brester said it appears the officer first on the scene of the bridge was mistaken in the initial assessment or the problem with the bridge worsened later. Noting that the Leo Frigo bridge typically carries 40,000 vehicles a day, Brester said other motorists surely would have taken notice of a situation as serious as sagging pavement.
 
"If it was as bad as people are saying at that time, I would think we would've gotten more calls," he said.
 
Soon, there were more calls.
 
At about 4:45 a.m., another truck driver, Richard Maufort, called 911 to report that conditions on the bridge were "not quite right."
 
Maufort, who delivers automobile parts to car dealers, recalled that something was amiss when he crossed over the bridge heading west about 4 a.m. On his return trip in the other direction, Maufort decided to alert the authorities to the sagging pavement.
 
The 57-year-old De Pere, Wis., resident later learned from radio reports that the situation was serious enough that police had closed the bridge.
 
"I'm glad nobody got hurt," he said. "I'm glad they found out what the problem was."
 
By 5:30 a.m., the bridge was closed to all traffic.
 
State highway officials soon determined that one of the piers supporting the bridge inexplicably sank into the ground, causing the 84-foot-wide structure to dip about 2 feet.
 
Built in 1980, the bridge carries traffic along Interstate 43 in Green Bay and represents one of city's most vital thoroughfares. Officials have indicated that it could be months or even a year before the bridge, named in honor of the former president of Frigo Cheese Corp., is back in service.
 
Engineers with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration are trying to determine what caused the problem and how it can be fixed.
 
Jason Lahm, a state bridge maintenance engineer, was getting ready for work when his phone rang at about 5 a.m. The caller from the state's traffic operations center in Milwaukee told Lahm there were reports that the Leo Frigo bridge was sagging.
 
Lahm, who has been with the department for 11 years, was the first state highway official in the Green Bay region alerted to the problem. Although skeptical that the bridge deck really had sunk, he rushed to the scene, arriving there about 30 minutes later.
 
Police had already closed the bridge, and Lahm could see for himself that the reports of sagging pavement were true. His first thoughts were of disbelief: "This can't happen."
 
But he called his supervisor and reported that the bridge would probably have to remain closed for a long time.
 
"I could determine that we had a significant issue as soon as I got to the site," Lahm said. "It was very obvious as soon as I saw it."
 
State highway officials say they have calculated that the pier sank into the ground sometime between 9 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 24, and 5 a.m. Wednesday, Sept. 25.
 
According to police records, two motorists drove around police squad cars and crossed over the bridge before officers sealed off the thoroughfare with barricades, detour signs and flares. The towering structure has been closed to traffic ever since.
 
Eyewitness Dale Ferron of Algoma, Wis., said he noticed the pavement problem en route to work about 3:45 a.m. Wednesday. The mail delivery contractor recalled being jostled in his car and then seeing a truck's headlights bouncing around behind him.
 
"It made my heart skip a beat," he said. "It was kind of like being on a roller coaster."
 
After arriving at work on Green Bay's west side, Ferron, 49, found himself troubled by thoughts that the bridge could be unstable and that other motorists could be in danger. So he grabbed a phone and called police.
 
Like so many other people, Ferron now is left wondering what caused the problem.
 
Or, as he put it, "Why all of a sudden now?"

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Nollywood Actor, Jim Iyke Receives Deliverance at TB Joshua’s Church

0 0
Read Time:56 Second

As The SCOAN’s Wise Men moved through the congregation in prayer, the lightning of God located Iyke and he was no longer able to control himself. Lunging towards one of the Wise Man as if to attack him, an evil spirit that had been tormenting the life of Jim Iyke manifested! The congregation in the auditorium and the overflow congregations shouted in surprise as they began to witness the deliverance of a man they were all too familiar with

The evil spirit that had tormented the life of Jim Iyke for so many years began to manifest, confessing that it was the cause of Iyke’s setback and disappointment. It confessed that it was the reason he could never marry, stating that it would not allow him to love anyone. It continued confessing that Iyke was the biggest and that it was only God’s grace that had kept him. As the evil spirit inside him struggled to attack the Wise Man, the supremacy of the Holy Spirit continued to overpower it

{gallery}stories/galleries/jim-iyke-delieverance:::0:0{/gallery}
 

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Cops: Daughter, husband kill mom; dad shoots them

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 23 Second
PITTSBURGH (AP) — A two-decade family feud came to a violent end when a man shot dead the two home invaders that killed his wife and son, not knowing the assailants included his long-estranged daughter, authorities said Sunday.
 
Though the investigation of Friday's shootings continues, authorities said it appears Josephine and Jeffrey Ruckinger planned to murder her family at their rural central Pennsylvania home — but it remains unclear what exactly led to the deadly confrontation.
 
"They parked at the bottom of a long driveway, and walked up, heavily armed," said Cambria County District Attorney Kelly Callihan.
 
Josephine Ruckinger was armed with a sawed-off 12-gauge shotgun and her husband had a Derringer pistol and a .22-caliber semi-automatic handgun as they approached the Frew family home in Ashville, about 40 miles southwest of State College, according to investigators.
 
John Frew, his wife Roberta, and their son John Jr., 47, had just returned from dinner out, and were watching TV in the living room of the white mobile home when there was a knock at the door, authorities said.
 
Police say Roberta, 64, answered the door, and cried out something like "Oh my God, they have guns!" before her daughter shot her at point-blank range. John Jr. then may have attempted to arm himself with a gun, but Jeffrey Ruckinger shot him multiple times in the chest, killing him, police said.
 
The elder Frew, 67, grabbed a .22 revolver and came out from the bedroom to find the daughter he didn't initially recognize pointing the shotgun at him. Frew fired once, hitting her in the head, then turned and exchanged fire with Jeffrey Ruckinger, killing him. He then called police.
 
Josephine Ruckinger was still alive when police arrived, but later died at an area hospital. John Frew was not hurt.
 
Callihan said that the preliminary investigation suggests that the elder Frew and his family were victims "of a pre-planned murder" plot, and that he acted in self-defense. Police also found a can of gas and lighter fluid in the Ruckingers' car.
 
Ballistics and toxicology tests are pending, investigators said.
 
Authorities are still exploring possible motives, but say there may have been burglaries and robberies at the Frew residence in the past.
 
A relative, Virginia Cruse, said the daughter and mother did not get along, but that she had no idea what spawned Friday's tragedy. The daughter had "a hatred toward the family," she said.
 
When Josephine was about 20, she and a boyfriend trashed her parents' home and stole items including a pistol, then fled to Pittsburgh, Cruse said. After that, she said, "more or less, they disowned her."

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %