Why Nigeria Needs No Elections In 2011

0 0
Read Time:14 Minute, 23 Second

Nigerians must insist of credible elections. It is the first prerequisite for the turning point that we sought. We know that corruptions, stupidity, senselessness and outright madness dominate Nigerian politics but credible elections remains the most single important avenue to start re-addressing our national woes.

Next in line is the scrapping of the EFCC and its replacement with a genuine, transparent, efficient and neutral body that will zealously pursue investigations and prosecutions of political criminals, looters, fraudsters and others who mismanage public/private funds. The new body must be able to arrest or prosecute anyone irrespective of their positions in the government or society.

When our elections are good and when any kind of political thief at all is sent to locations like kirikiri maximum prison, discipline and sanity will return to our lives. The future will be ready for our children.

However I don’t think Nigeria should have any elections in 2011. Come September the 19th 2010 I will vote again in the Swedish Elections. I voted 4 years ago as well. My voting card has been sent to me by post. I can actually vote before September 19 at some designated centres. But if I wait until the 19th, there will be a lot of people and I must cast my vote latest 1800hr.

Nigeria should probably avoid elections in 2011.

If Elections are conducted in Nigeria in 2011 under the present arrangements of things, political assassinations and kidnappings will rise to new heights. Many saints and lambs will be slaughtered in the survival game of Nigerian do-or-die politics.

Any election that will be conducted in Nigeria must meet international and acceptable standards. Anything short of that must be avoided. The time on our hand between now and when INEC planned to conduct new elections (January-April 2011) is likely too short for Nigeria to achieve the prerequisites for credible elections.

As I write I am convinced that all the political parties are already planning how to stuff ballot boxes with fake election materials. Plans are in top gears in Nigeria to ensure multiple registrations and multiple voting among many other electoral vices.

In 2007, across Nigeria from the Deep Delta to the Hot Deserts of northern Nigeria, PDP chairmen, godfathers, touts and thugs across Nigeria sat in secret locations thumbing on electoral materials. Other political parties fought hard too in this useless game of dirty politics but the machinery of the PDP was too sophisticated in these cheating games plus having Maurice Iwu doing the deeds of the most wicked ones. See how people were sweating in secret locations heavily guarded by men with sophisticated weapons of war and even cutlasses!

Under the present circumstances in Nigeria this feat will repeat itself in 2011. PDP will once again use the machinery of the government to outwit the others. Political madness will continue and Jega will be helpless. He will cook lies like the actors before him who occupied the seat. The problem will not be Jega.

We fail to see that the system in Nigeria have turned all good men and women to vultures and stupid liars. In today’s Nigeria I have no living hero. I am standing alone on my belief and principles of do it well or get out the way! Don’t ignite my anger by reminding me of your favourite internet-popular czar because Obasanjo, Andy Uba and the jet loads of prostitutes and raw dollars are still flying. 

The malpractices associated with our elections must be tackled before new elections. The scenario of stuffing ballot boxes, multiple voting, voting at secret locations, intimidation, assassination connected to elections and as a matter of fact the simultaneous eradication of corruption and the eventual delivery of the dividends of democracy are tied to one thing: credible elections where votes are counted to elect public officers knowing that the votes will be re-counted every 4 years.

If a politician knows that his position is jeopardised if he doesn’t deliver in office, he or she will start to perform before the next voting season. We must ensure at any future election that votes are what bring people into offices and can be used to sweep them away. Until then the intimidation, kidnapping and even assassinations of political opponents and genuine reporters of political affairs will rise and we won’t have performances in offices. Organised corruption will remain our hallmark.

Since we can have a new face for our anticorruption agency after a fine electoral process, then those who loot even after being voted into offices must face judgment. Hopefully the useless immunity clause will be removed by emerging revolutionary minds in our society. Let everyone go to judgement irrespective of their positions.

Nigerians must insist on the removal of the immunity clause after a viable financial corruption agency is established. EFCC is not on my mind. That is just a toothless bulldog whose activities where ruined since Obasanjo’s yeye 3rd third bid. EFCC died with the 3rd term agenda. Wake up gullible people!

What then do we need in 2011?

In 2011 the Ministry of Internal Affairs must step in. That Ministry must work hand in hand with all other public and private institutions in Nigeria to ensure that it makes an appropriate list of Nigerians. The Ministry of Internal Affairs must ensure that every living Nigeria carries an identity card with each person having a specific number. That number will be a key number for the electoral commission.

We must find everyone living in Nigeria and ensure that they carry an identity card. In everyway possible double or multiple registrations must be avoided and punishable with long-term imprisonment. I recommend 15 years minimum.

In 2011 Nigeria must gather together her computer gurus, forensic experts and statisticians who know what figures and numbers represent. This group of people are part of our sources of the hope for the future.

Look around, see the computer gurus in Nigeria. Get the technology, train them if necessary and give them the incentives to allow them face the task without fear or favour. Computer experts and statisticians in Nigeria must rally round the Internal Affairs Ministry and INEC. They should propagate these ideas. They are experts and they know what to do.

Between now and the end of 2011, they must work round the clock to make those missions possible and they must report to the appropriate authorities when some idiots start to rare their ugly heads in multiple registrations.

In 2011 Nigerians must ensure that one major thing happen. This is the radiation of both truth and trust among the citizens-that we can make it if we work together. Our collective aim will be to ensure that this process work. This process will establish everlasting sanity when it comes to identification of individuals and the eventual benefits in elections and other endeavours of life.

I am tired of people saying this is impossible in Nigeria. If this is impossible then it means the black man is not intelligent. It means that he is so foolish that he doesn’t even know what he needs to get himself a decent life and to make his society better for his own benefits. Are we stupid? Are we retarded?

Impossible is nothing! Candidly from my perspective, Nigerians should forget about elections in 2011. I tell you all these assassination will cease. Political violence will vanish once those illiterates, thugs, educated morons and daredevil politicians know that something is on ground to computerise the system-something that will checkmate their atrocities before, during and after elections. They will simmer down. Political manifestos and reasoning can prevail again in Nigeria.

Let each person carry an identity card with peculiar numbers. At the end of 2011 or whatever time our geniuses have finished with the identity card registration processes, INEC should send out voting cards that tally with the identity cards. When a person cast his or her votes, the system automatically records it. And since we have put our geniuses in place at the beginning to avoid double registrations, attempts by people (some will beat the system anyway) to vote twice will be minimal.

But I tell you with the simple finger print technology and dedicated statisticians and forensic experts on ground, there may never be anything called double or multiple registrations. This is where the rule of law, its effectiveness and application come into play.

We must not forget that if we fail in our next election, the black race failed, again! We are then simply dumb and foolish. We will then not be able to protest that we are not intelligent enough to carve our activities and carry them out successfully. If we fail it will go a long way to show that colonisation of the black race was far better!

If we fail like we did in 1959, 1979, 1983, 1993, 1999, 2003, 2007, then take it or leave it Nigerians are very bad species of the black race. If we fail again, then there is something wrong with our cognitive abilities. A thorough anthropological research will be required to verify why we allow the few thoughtless people among us to continue to dictate the pattern and emergence of our political structures. We know that our political display and the outcomes reflected by extreme poverty and diseases for examples have been used as the benchmark to “judge” who we are and how we think.

The turning point for Nigeria is now or never! We have had enough of stupid and useless elections since 1959! Haba ! Ki lo deee!!

Did we pay mugun fees? To whom? Let’s get the ID card scheme and elections right jooo!

My suggestions may not be the most appropriates especially against the backdrop of our extreme diversities of opinions. Our views of life, essence of living and the way we see relationships between humanity, public service and our interplay with nature are too diverse that we have always failed to find common grounds. It’s a dilemma.

Yet I’m convinced there are ways to pursue and execute credible elections that will neutralise all the electoral failures since 1959. We are 140m but democratic successes have been recorded in India where you’ll find more than 1b people.

INEC must ensure that all Nigerian voters are registered not only on paper but on the computer system in all your offices across the nation.

Please don’t give us the excuse that Nigeria is not yet that developed. We are sensible and we must begin to do things in compliance with the present age and technological advancements.

Credible elections after 50 years of waste and hopelessness must happen now or we will never have them.

Postpone those elections until the initial things are done right! Why the rush? Where are we heading with stupid elections?

Put everyone on the database and ensure that the compilations, distribution/collection of voter’s card tally with the finger prints or any other forensic/character recognition feature.

Nigerians should be able to vote even before the election dates to avoid crowding at the voting centres and late voting on the last day.

Apart from the voting centres or tents on the streets, open up the post offices and other special centres for pre voting.

Men and women above 80 years old and people with disabilities should vote before the actual election day if they so wished. Send them special forms with your staff and party representatives in attendance. Provide credible witnesses when these categories of people cast their votes at home or at the hospitals. Don’t tell us you don’t have the possibilities to serve everybody, unless you mean that INEC can’t think of how to solve problems or face tough challenges.

The Electoral Commission must ensure that the election materials are available several weeks in advance. As suggested earlier, let our pre-voting period span at least 2 weeks before the actual voting day.

Once a vote is casted, that person’s name is ticked on the database as “having voted”. Therefore an individual cannot vote twice. INEC’s staff members must be well educated and trusted. Those found wanting should be dismissed immediately or prosecuted if they engaged in criminal manipulations.

When the final count is made, the cumulative total of votes casted must tally with the ticks on the central database in your establishment or at your headquarters.

INEC must function not as a Jega-entity but as an organisation with structures that any dude can mange with minimal intellectual capacity.

INEC must avoid half-baked elections or do-or-die elections just because we must have elections. In 2007 we became a laughing stock in the comity of nations in the name of power transfer. It was one of the biggest shames I’d faced in my life. The black man was reduced to “incapable” to do the right thing. In addition to outstanding stigmatizations, he became the one who can’t count and add.

We want to get it right this time and we don’t want any excuse.

The people should know how the electoral commission is collaborating with the various ministries especially the Internal Affairs’ Ministry.

Tell us how the postal agencies can work with you to ensure that voting cards or papers are delivered to the right persons from age 18 when the time comes.

If it will take 2 years to get everything perfect, please start now. Provide a timeline of what it would take and how Nigerians can have credible elections.

In our next elections, everything associated with violence and stuffing of ballot boxes must be made irrelevant and worthless.

Stuffing of ballot boxes and printing of fake electoral materials will be useless if a person’s number is ticked on the database after casting his or her votes.

Please don’t tell us that we don’t have the technology. We have the money for anything in this country. We can afford 10 presidential jets if we so desire. What is computer technology for Nigeria? Piece of cake!

Nigeria and Nigerians must not go ahead with any crude voting methods. All the political parties are probably now scheming on how to surpass one another with the ballot stuffing. Kidnapping and all forms of madness associated with elections will be reduced or eliminated if the eventual playing field becomes open, clear and non-surmountable by evil machinations now dominant in Nigerian politics.

PDP was dominant in 2007 because they had more access to INEC and the instruments of governance. The order of things must change and the scheming of INEC is the biggest source of checkmate. Nigeria must for once give Africa an example worth emulating.

A neutral INEC with computer based analyses of voting and results by applying state of the art technology will make sure that all those planning to rig are wasting their time and energy.

My arguments about the 2011 elections can be expanded beyond this scope. The bottom line is that what is worth doing at all is worth doing well. In history nearly has never caught a bird.

Please and please no more primitive elections in Nigeria. No more procrastination on the application of computer, information and communication technology in our elections.

If we must shift our elections to make room for the application of the latest technology to ensure that our votes are counted, so be it. We have wasted 50 years of our lives and two generations. This ingredient-a credible election-is a needed stepping stone for the turning point.

It is about time our voted are counted. INEC has an obligation to fulfil one of the things that give us our sense of dignity. The realisation of our fundamental human rights to vote and be voted for since 1959 is back in INEC’s court. Let time not be a hindrance.

The time for wishful thinking should be over. Somehow all the genuine advocates of true democracy and trusted agencies responsible for the protection of human rights and democratic principles must work hand in hand in unity and trust to carry the citizenry along on the need for transparency and accountability in the on going electoral processes.

We have been through wuruwuru, please let us not see jagajaga.

If we fail again this time, I will come back to the intelligence question: how intelligent are we really in solving our problems and taking stands for the essence of our lives?

The solutions to Nigeria’s problems lie on our hands, how we think, how we act. The solutions are collective responsibilities and are multi-faceted. We can rekindle the dead hope of Nigeria.

I am convinced beyond reasonable doubts that a credible/acceptable electoral process is the single most important step forward in healing Nigeria. The entire healing processes are cumbersome and extremely long but results can be achieved when my children’s children arrive if we start now.

 aderounmu@gmail.com

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Helping the Nigerian Economy Stay in Shape

0 0
Read Time:5 Minute, 51 Second
In the most important speech of his life, the moment that would launch a Titanic battle affecting the lives of ordinary citizens and the economy, that could define his presidency, restore badly eroded public faith in the political system ability to serve people, and redeem a promise more than forty nine years in the making to provide good economic policies. President Goodluck Jonathan made a promised of change in political and economic system of our nation.
‘Wise men know that change is part of necessary process which societies must pass if they are to grow and survived in improved state. Wiser men know that change has other faces whose influence might well lead to the improvishment of the very society we wish to nourish’. Nigerians have learned from bitter experiences not to take their leaders at their word. The phrase ‘credibility gap’ entered into their language with Ibrahim Babangida (IBB), Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP); the phenomena grew with every successive presidents. From Vission 2010 of Sani Abacha, Olusegun Obasanjo privatisation, to Yar’adua seven point agenda, Nigerians have been disillusioned again and again and again.
I’d like to make two points to open the discussion, one is general and one is specific. The general point I want to make is that I think profound change has happened in societies when essentially people understand that the cost of staying with the present situations is greater than the cost of change. The specific point I want to make is we’ve always known where we are going, but we don’t know how exactly we would get there. This is a time for profound change, profound opportunity, and profound dislocation and uncertainty.
A lot of Nigerians are facing the future with fair. They don’t know if they can trust their government or the so called corporate Nigerians, and private institutions. Because, they are not just faced with poverty, but an extreme poverty which goes beyond the World Bank narrow definition to mean low income. Nigerians poverty is beyond that, is about too many people having little access to health care, basic literacy, to sanitary arrangements or clean water and spending their lives fighting morbidity often succumbing to premature mortality.
Since independence, Nigeria’s economic policies under successive administration were seldom subjected to critical public discussion, an important ingredient of a good public policy. Most of our previous administration was under military regimes, which has no claim
to popular mandate. Only the last eleven years held hope for democracy as a system of government in Nigeria. Dictionary.com (2010), defined democracy as the government by the people; in which the supreme power is vested on them and a society characterized by social justice, equity, and fairness.
The forthcoming general elections in Nigeria will provide us opportunity for a new beginning, including; a fundamental shift of our economic policies, especially policies that affects our national cohesion and social harmony. However, Nigerians seems to be missing the essence of democracy. What we refer in Nigeria as dividends of democracy are constructing buildings without libraries, laboratories, quality teachers and more importantly student intake with adequate preparation or building hospitals without quality doctors, nurses, drugs, and equipment.
At the centre and heart of democracy is the opportunity it provides for us to discuss publicly and openly, the government policy of our nation, especially the economic policy direction of the nation, which determines the question of social justice- the ultimate objective of all decent societies. Social justice cannot be achieved by concentrating our minds on power rotation or zoning, but only by reducing and eliminating poverty and inequality.
For a democracy, our reforms of the last eleven years and their implementation might as well have been dictated by the politburo of a communist party! It is formulated and executed through top down imposition by a group of few styling itself as a technocracy not constrained by politics because the teams are always answerable to the president and not the people. But in a democracy, policies that determine the future wellbeing- the social and political stability of society should be in the realm of politics and be subjected to full public discussion.
The issue of public discussion and social participation is central to the making of a good policy within a democratic framework. We should begin this now, in the run-up to the next set of elections due in few months. It is for us all to determine the direction of the society we want to build and live in.
Societies and situations differ and the answers will be different in different countries, but, luckily, for us there is accumulated evidence of over a century of various reforms strategies conceived and implemented all over the world and from which we can learn some useful and practical lessons. These reforms have been implemented in the developed economies, developing economies, and transition economies.
Those involve in managing our economy cannot be unaware of the change of professional, academia and economist opinion from the orthodoxy of the Washington consensus. That free market economy alone will not solve all the problems. The challenge facing us in Nigeria today, is balancing the acts. To decide where to draw the line; how to balance public and private spheres: public good and private interest: visible hand of the government and regulators: the invisible hand of the market-the balance between the government and the market.
In view of this, our major task is to order our priorities. In the first instance, we have to build institution of state; a professional and independent judiciary: a professional an incorruptible force, and well trained and professional civil service. Every economic model requires an effective state for it’s to flourish. An effective state will then clearly stipulate the appropriate legal and regulatory regimes with a strong but equitable tax regime. We need an active effective state that will regulate the activities of the market to check the abuses of special interest corporate groups and financial interest. This is not to stifle private initiative but to ensure that the private sector does not escape regulation.
Way Forward
De-Colonise our colonised minds. The economic policies should be appropriately sequenced with objective of combining the pursuit of sustainable growth and human development strategy by devoting massive resources to education (education is a prerequisite for prosperity), and healthcare in order to eliminate poverty and reduce inequality. In short, the government should put people at the centre of its reforms, economic policies, and development that would be about transforming their lives, not just transforming economies or sterile government statistics.
Growth should be about people and their lives and not statistical GDP growth figures. We should move from policies of trickle-down economies to a strategy based on a comprehensive development with equity which would enable us build a society where morality, justice and fairness would be an altered by time.
Suleiman Nadabo,
Msc Strategic IT Management,
Stockholm University,
Stockholm, Sweden.
sl_nadabo@hotmail.com

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Nigeria: Vision 2020 document is ready for inauguration – FG

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 19 Second

The final copy of the country‘s Vision 2020 document, an economic transformation blueprint that is expected to launch Nigeria into the league of the 20 most developed economies of the world by the year 2020, is ready, the Minister in charge of National Planning, who is also the Deputy Chairman, National Planning Commission, Dr.Shamsudeen Usman, has said.

Usman, who disclosed this during the inauguration of the Joint Planning Commission for the 16th Nigerian Economic Summit in Abuja on Friday, said that the document would be officially inaugurated by President Goodluck Jonathan soon.

This year‘s summit, tagged, ”Nigeria at 50: The Challenge of Visionary Leadership and Good Governance”, is expected to take place by October.

He said that the Federal Government had concluded the last phase of the preparation of the first four-year implementation plan.

According to Usman, ”The final copy of the Vision 20: 2020 had been ready since October last year; only that it was yet to be officially inaugurated. It will be officially inaugurated by President Jonathan as soon as his approval has been given. The current administration is committed to repositioning Nigeria to join the league of 20 largest economies in the world by the year 2020.”

He said that the economic transformation blueprint was developed with the active involvement of stakeholders from the three tiers of government and the private sector, including members of the NESG and the donor community.

He said,” The implementation of the Vision 20:2020 is currently in full swing with the last phase of the preparation of the first four-year implementation plan being concluded.”

He added that this year‘s summit will improve on the success recorded during the 2009 event, noting that the government would provide the necessary assistance to ensure a hitch-free summit.

He said, ”The efficacy of public private partnerships has been proven in both developed and emerging markets, leading to unprecedented growth and development in a number of countries all over the world. The Joint Planning Committee will work under the joint coordination of the NESG and National Planning Commission.”

Speaking at the event, the Director General, NESG, Mr. Frank Nweke Jr., said that this year‘s summit would witness a remarkable improvement over the previous ones, adding that the event would provide a veritable platform for providing workable solutions to the country‘s numerous economic challenges.

He said, ”All over the world, various governments have realized the efficacy of the partnership between the public and private sector in order to achieve economic growth and development.” This year‘s summit will be a remarkable improvement from that of last year in terms of providing workable solutions to the myriads of economic problems facing our country”

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Jonathan Goodluck can contest for president 2011 -PDP

0 0
Read Time:8 Minute, 55 Second

ABUJA— THE National Executive Committee, NEC, of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, yesterday, ratified the decision of the Board of Trustees, BoT, and its extended caucus to sustain the zoning and rotation arrangement of the party, just as it said that President Goodluck Jonathan should contest for the 2011 Presidential election.

At the end of the NEC meeting, members agreed that zoning and rotation must remain in the best interest of the country at this level of development in line with the Party’s constitution .They also said that other persons can contest for the position at the party’s primaries as in 2003 when the likes of late Abubakar Rimi ran against former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

The NEC members said that President Jonathan should contest and remain in office till 2015, because the present ticket was a continuation of late President Umaru Yar’Adua’s.

Rising from its 52nd National Executive Committee meeting held at the party’s conference hall, the members also killed the online registration project of the National Chairman, Dr. Okwesilieze Nwodo.

The online registration project was flagged off by President Jonathan last Monday as part of Nwodo’s reforms for the Party. The meeting which started at 1.40 pm with an opening prayer said by the former governor of Old Bendel State, Dr. Samuel Ogbemudia after President Jonathan entered the venue of the meeting at 1.38 pm, ended at 6.30pm after what was termed a serious brainstorming and stormy session.

The party said that the issue of zoning must be adopted at all levels from the wards, local and state. Though, there was no briefing by the party at the end of the meeting, it was gathered that the meeting did not go smoothly as the governors reportedly confronted the national chairman of the party over his reforms which they described as not friendly to them.

Rationale behind reforms

Vanguard learnt that the National Chairman explained the rationale behind his reforms, but that he could not convince the governors.

It was also gathered that motion for the adoption of zoning and rotation staying in the party was moved by the Katsina State Governor and seconded by former Chairman, Board of Trustees, BoT, Chief Tony Anenih.

According to a source who was at the meeting, the governors and state chairmen of the party also said that the National Working Committee, NWC, of the party did not have the constitutional right to sack a state Executive of the party, stressing that such issues must be referred to NEC.

It was learnt that the dissolution of Ogun State Exco came up and the National Chairman made a u_turn and promised to visit Ogun State on Monday to meet with stakeholders of the party.

On the online registration, it was gathered that members including Governors Gabriel Suswan of Benue, Emmanuel Uduaghan of Delta and Timipre Sylva of Bayelsa spoke against it.

They reportedly argued that those in the rural areas might not be able to afford the N1,200 and that considering the time frame when the party is preparing for election, the project may not be possible.

Even when Chief Tony Anenih and Samuel Ogbemudia tried to defend the online registration project that it could work as a pilot scheme and be made to go side by side with the current mode of registration, the arguments still did not save the situation.

Kwara State Governor, Dr. Bukola Saraki, reportedly moved a motion to rest the project and this was seconded by one of the PDP Chairmen from the South west, to finally lay the project to rest.

Nothing stops Jonathan from running—Nwodo

Speaking at the meeting, Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Dr. Okwesilieze Nwodo said, yesterday, that nothing stopped President Goodluck Jonathan from running the 2011 presidential election.

He said that President Jonathan was currently enjoying a joint ticket of late President Umaru Yar’Adua, adding that if the late President were to be alive today, he would have contested and rounded off in 2015.

Nwodo who spoke at the 52nd National Executive Committee, NEC, meeting of the party, noted that contesting the 2011 presidential election was President Jonathan’s entitlement.

He said: “The PDP as a responsible organization is responsive to the spirit and letters of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which enjoins the practice of federal character in the distribution of public offices.

“The misconception, accusations that PDP has abandoned zoning is very far from the truth. When our president emerged, he chose a northern Muslim as his vice president .

When the chairman resigned, he was replaced by another chairman from the south eastern zone. Our Senate president, speaker, deputy Senate president and deputy speaker are from different zones of the country.

“At the state level, we encourage rotation of our governors among the three senatorial zones in our state. How then can PDP be said to have abandoned zoning or rotation?

In the  2011 presidential primaries, we were faced with unforeseen circumstances, which can only be likened to a national crisis we faced recently when our late President Umaru Musa Yar`Adua was ill and couldn’t transfer power to the then Vice President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan.

“The country rose to the occasion and parliament successfully transmitted power to the vice president as actingPresident. In the zoning arrangement, we didn’t envisage that a serving president would die in office, unfortunately we lost our dear president.

You will all recall that this scenario played out in the past in Adamawa State in the case of Atiku Abubakar and Boni Haruna. This was when Atiku Abubakar was nominated as the running mate to President Obasanjo.

Right beneficiary

“Boni Haruna, in spite of the court challenge to deny him that mandate was adjudged by the courts as right beneficiary of that ticket and he went on to do two terms as governor of Adamawa State. Today Dr. Goodluck Jonathan by the dictate of our constitution is exercising the term of a joint mandate, given by the people of our great country.

If our late president were alive today, we wouldn’t be contesting his right to run for a second term under our national constitution. It was his entitlement.

“But Dr. Jonathan who is part and parcel of that mandate has a right to contest the remaining of that joint ticket in 2011. This will, of course, not exclude any other aspirant from any part of the country from contesting the presidential primary, as it has become the custom of our party.”

Nwodo who intimated NEC members of planned reforms for the party, especially in the areas of updating the manifesto, said: “It has become imperative, due to the new Electoral Act to hold a special convention and bi-annual conference to update our party constitution before the primary election.

Already the constitutional amendment notices have gone out, but additional notices would follow to capture the changes in the Electoral Act and other areas.

“Today, we will be asking NEC to approve to roll out these reforms as the party has discussed the issue of zoning through the organs of the party and the informed view is that PDP has entrenched in its constitution zoning and rotation of public offices in the spirit of fairness, equity and justice.”

Zoning debate a negation of Nigerian nationhood—Anyaoku

Meantime, former Commonwealth Secretary-General, Chief Emeka Anyaoku, has described the raging zoning debate as a negation of Nigerian nationhood, saying that the zoning that occurred in 1998/99 was a unique national crisis engendered by June 12 annulment.

Anyaoku who likened the national response to cancellation of the June 12 presidential poll to a similar situation in Canada in 1968 said that insisting on zoning today was like re-applying a therapy that was used to cure a national ailment that had been treated.

He said: “From a national and non-partisan view point, I must warn that the ongoing zoning debate within the PDP is a negation of Nigerian nationhood. To all observers, it was clear that the zoning that occurred in 1998/99 was a direct response to the unique national crisis precipitated by the inexplicable annulment of the country’s hitherto most credible presidential election and the subsequent death of its acknowledged winner, MKO Abiola, in incarceration.

“The crisis had taken Nigeria to the precipice of national disintegration and the two main political parties at the time wisely responded by selecting their presidential candidates from the seriously aggrieved geographical zone of the country.

“This response was comparable to what happened in Canada in 1968 when in reaction to a similar threat to Canada’s continued existence as one polity by a secession movement in Quebec, the French speaking zone of the country, the out-going Prime Minister, Lester B Pearson, led the governing Liberal Party, to go over the heads of the established party leaders from the English-speaking zones to choose a young French_speaking politician, Pierre Trudeau, as the new Prime Minister in order to save the integrity of Canada.

“Nigeria, like Canada, should by now have consigned both that unique and hopefully unrepeatable national crisis of 1993-98 to history.

To advocate zoning today, 50 years after our independence, is, therefore, like reintroducing a therapy that was applied to a national ailment which all patriotic citizens would regard as having been successfully treated with the reaffirmation of Nigerian nationhood over a decade ago.”

Roll call at PDP NEC Meeting

President Goodluck Jonathan
Vice President Mohammed Namadi Sambo
Senate President David Mark
Speaker Dimeji Bankole
Dr. Alex Ekwueme
Alhaji Ibrahim Mantu
Chief Barnabas Gemade
Dr. Ahmadu Ali,
Prince Vincent Eze Ogbulafor
Dr. Samuel Ogbemudia
Chief Tony Anenih.
Chief Ebenezer Babatope
Professor Jerry Gana
Adamu Hassan,
Senator Walid Jibrin,
Senator Stella Omu,
MajGen Mohammadu Magoro (Rtd),
Sen. Abubakar Sodangi
Shuaibu Oyedokun,
Nana Aisha Kadiri
Yekini Adeojo
Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu,
Kassim Ibrahim Imam
Gov Emmanuel Uduaghan
Gov  Babangida Aliyu,
GovChristopher Alao-Akala,
Gov Isa Yuguda
Gov Godswill Akpabio,
Gov Rotimi  Amaechi,
Gov Liyel Imoke,
Gov Sullivan Chime.
Gov Bukola Saraki
Gov Saidu Dakingari
Gov Ibrahim Shema
Gov Danjuma Goje
Gov Segun Oni,
Gov Timipre Sylva,
Gov Olagunsoye Oyinlola,
Gov Aliyu Shinkafi,
Gov Gbenga Daniel,
Gov Martin Elechi.
Gov  Sule Lamido,
Gov Akwe Doma,
Gov Murtala Nyako,
Dep Gov Ramallan Yero
Dep Gov Paullen Tallen
Hajia Hauwa Kida
Mrs Christy Silas,
Hajia Rabi Murktar Mohammed
Senator Nicholas Ugbane,
Senator Osita Izunaso,
Senator Lee Maeba,
Garba Matazu,
Farouk Lawal,
Ataii Idoko

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Nigeria PDP throws open 2011 presidential ticket

0 0
Read Time:11 Minute, 28 Second

The contentious zoning threatening the fragile peace in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was settled yesterday with the party retaining the arrangement, but with an addendum that its presidential ticket is open to all interested aspirants.

National Chairman Dr. Okwesilieze Nwodo had given an indication of how the controversial issue would be resolved at the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) in his opening speech before the attendees went into a closed-door session.

Nwodo told the party faithful at Wadata Plaza, venue of the NEC meeting in Abuja that the PDP had not jettisoned the zoning arrangement for party and elective offices. Daily Sun also learnt that the PDP governors had also at their meeting on Wednesday night as well as at the expanded caucus meeting later at the Presidential Villa, canvassed the retention of zoning, while also allowing any willing aspirant to seek party’s presidential ticket.
The NEC ended at about 6.pm yesterday without a communiqué from the party’s National Working Committee (NWC).

It’s settled!
PDP throws open 2011 presidential ticket
NEC suspends e-registration, admits Abia Governor
•It’s victory for Jonathan, says Lar
…No, it’s a big defeat –Yakassa

But a Daily Sun source revealed that the party resolved to sustain the existing zoning arrangement, even as it resolved to throw open the party’s presidential ticket to interested aspirants. The source further revealed that the Katsina State Governor, Ibrahim Shema moved the motion to sustain zoning, while the former chairman of the PDP Board of Trustees, (BoT), Chief Tony Anenih seconded it.
The party, however, advised the PDP NWC to stay action on the orchestrated e-registration scheme for party members. The PDP governors spoke in unison against it at the well-attended meeting.

The NEC also resolved to re-admit the Abia State Governor, Theodore Orji into the party. The Abia governor had on Wednesday paid a visit to the party national secretariat to formally declare his intention to return to the PDP.
Incidentally, most of the positions taken at yesterday’s NEC meeting seemed to tally with what was agreed upon at the late night meeting of the expanded caucus meeting of Wednesday as well as another meeting of PDP governors, which held at the Kwara Lodge, Abuja.

At that meeting which began at about 5.00 p.m. the governors agreed to harmonise their position on zoning before proceeding for the expanded caucus meeting at the Presidential Villa. The governors’ positions are: 1. Zoning should be retained, because it’s in the party constitution and the constitution of Nigeria through federal character provision. 2 It’s the constitutional right of President Goodluck Jonathan to contest and he shouldn’t be denied that opportunity going by the circumstance he emerged as the president.

3 The party should allow any member of the party to contest and also provide a level playing field for all contestants in principles of equity, fairness and justice. The national caucus was expanded to accommodate the governors to make whatever agreed upon to sail through at the NEC. All the positions of the governors were adopted by the expanded caucus and literally all of them sailed through at the NEC meeting. To ensure that nothing went amiss, the governors met again before going for yesterday’s NEC meeting.

Speaking earlier at the opening of the NEC meeting, the PDP Chairman, Dr Nwodo said: “The PDP as a responsible organization is responsive to the spirit and letters of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which enjoins the practice of federal character in the distribution of public offices.
“The misconception and accusations that PDP has abandoned zoning is very far from the truth. When our president emerged, he chose a northern Muslim as his vice president. When the chairman resigned, he was replaced by another chairman from the South-eastern zone. Our Senate President, Speaker, Deputy Senate President and Deputy Speaker are from different zones of the country.

“At the state level, we encourage rotation of our governors among the three senatorial zones in our state. How then can PDP be said to have abandoned zoning or rotation?” But Nwodo declared that even when zoning existed in the party constitution, there had never been hindrance to the aspiration of individual members within the party who showed interests in the presidential ticket, since the inception of the party in 1999. But he acknowledged that the speculated presidential ambition of President Jonathan was a test case for the party’s constitution and could be likened to the dilemma the nation faced when the late president Umaru Yar‘Adua was ill and his office was vacant.  

“In the 2011 presidential primary, we were faced with unforeseen circumstances, which can only be likened to a national crisis we faced recently when our late president Umaru Musa Yar‘Adua was ill and couldn’t transfer power to the then vice president, Dr Goodluck Jonathan. “The country rose to the occasion and parliament successfully transmitted power to the vice president as acting president. “In the zoning arrangement, we didn’t envisage that a serving president would die in office, unfortunately we lost our dear president.

“Today, Dr Goodluck Jonathan by the dictate of our constitution is exercising the term of a joint mandate, given by the people of our great country. If our late president were alive today, we wouldn’t be contesting his right to run for a second term under our national constitution. It was his entitlement.
“But Dr Jonathan who is part and parcel of that mandate has a right to contest the remaining of that joint ticket in 2011. This will of course, not exclude any other aspirant from any part of the country from contesting the presidential primary, as it has become the custom of our party.

“You will all recall that this scenario played out in the past in Adamawa State in the case of his Excellency, Atiku Abubakar and His Excellency Boni Haruna. This was when Atiku Abubakar was nominated as the running mate to President Obasanjo. Boni Haruna, in spite of the court challenge to deny him that mandate was adjudged by the courts as the right beneficiary of that ticket and he went on to do two terms as governor of Adamawa State.
Nwodo also told the PDP NEC members that a special convention to amend the party’s constitution would soon be convened to take care of emerging development, in line with the dictate of the Electoral Act.

In his remarks before the gathering entered into a closed-door session, President Jonathan appealed to the PDP members to work for the progress of the party and admitted that party faithful were bound to hold dissenting views on issues, but must be amicably resolved in the overall interest of the party.   He observed non-PDP members had showed more than passing interest in the contentious issue on zoning, in the party, an indication that they had conceded the 2011 presidency to the PDP.       

“At our NEC, we don’t stay here and box ourselves and we must maintain that tradition, because that is one of the good things we must bequeath to the next generation and we will disappoint Nigerians if we box ourselves and burn down our houses.
“We will work together as a party, because what happens in the PDP happens in the whole country. Just look at the issue of zoning or no zoning, it is PDP primaries, whether we zone or don’t zone, it is our own internal affairs. But the debate is even being spearheaded more by non-PDP members. That shows that what happens in PDP, in fact, they already conceded the presidency to us. Otherwise, they have no business coming to join our own debate. That means that already they know that the PDP will produce the president of this country, but do it well.”

Meanwhile, former Plateau State governor and foundation chairman of the party, Chief Solomon Lar, yesterday expressed delight over the decision taken by the NEC to allow President Jonathan to contest the 2011 presidential election. Lar told journalists that the position taken on zoning was in the best interest of the country.
“The party has been able to resolve the matter in the interest of the country.
I am happy that the party has said President Jonathan can continue with the joint ticket he enjoyed with the late  President Yar‘Adua. That’s the position of the party,” the former national chairman of PDP submitted.
But elder statesman, Alhaji Tanko Yakasai in his reaction last night said the outcome of the PDP NEC meeting was a total defeat for President Jonathan and his aides given that “technically speaking, it means that Jonathan is disqualified to contest the 2011 elections on the platform of the PDP.”

Yakasai explained that the two core items, which the president expected to happen in his favour, did not materialize at the end of the day, noting that the NEC did not eventually anoint him as the PDP’s presidential candidate for the 2011 elections, just as he failed to get the party to register its members by e-registration.
Yakasai, who admitted that he was yet to be fully briefed on the decisions reached by the NEC, explained that he was also not unaware of the structure of the party’s decision, which sounded rather ambiguous.
In his words: “I am happy that the NEC retained zoning in the party. But if they say that Jonathan can contest the elections in their party, then something is still wrong with their decision. My feeling is that they lacked the courage to come out and tell Jonathan that he cannot contest… because they cannot retain zoning and still say that anybody, including President Jonathan, can contest.”

He expressed joy over the cloud that is gathering in favour of zoning the presidency to the North, but expressed bitterness over the attitude of Jonathan and his supporters. Hear him: “What is worrying me is that Jonathan and his supporters are now holding us hostage. This is because we are being asked to give him our votes as ransom money. It is wrong for Jonathan to encourage the division of this country because of his political ambition.”
He concluded that, “My fear is that the way the whole drama (on zoning) is going, it is going to eventually end up creating a dichotomy between Christians and Muslims in Nigeria and that would be most unfortunate. All over the world, the president is seen as an agent of unity, but more and more, the way things are being played out, Jonathan and his supporters are becoming the agents of disunity in the land.”

Suleiman Argungu, former deputy governor of Kebbi State and a chieftain of All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) in another reaction last night said the decision was PDP’s pecular of playing with people’s intelligence.
“Ordinarily, the party should have come clearly to state where it stands instead of the usual abracadabra. It is also an indication that the party is not willing to follow due process and rule of law, because the constitution of any party or organisation is supposed to be sacrosanct and any deviation from the constitution is supposed to be met with severe sanction.
“Although I am not a member of the ruling party but I want to advise Jonathan to abide strictly by his party’s constitution and not to allow PDP to mess him up,” Argungu stressed.

Roll call at the PDP NEC meeting 
President Goodluck Jonathan, Vice President Namadi Sambo, PDP Chairman, Dr. Okwesilieze Nwodo and other members of the NWC,  former national chairmen, Ahmadu Ali,  Prince Vincent Ogbulafor, Barnabas Gemade, Chief Solomon Lar.
Speaker Dimeji Bankole, Deputy Speaker Bayero Nafada, President of the Senate, David Mark, Deputy President of Senate, Ike Ekweremadu.

Former Board of Trustees Chairman, Chief Tony Anenih, Deputy Governor Kaduna, Alhaji Ramalan Yero, former Deputy President of the Senate, Alhaji Ibrahim Mantu, Governor Oyo, Adebayo Alao-Akala, Sokoto Governor, Aliyu Wamakko,  Ebonyi Governor, Martins Elechi, Second Republic Vice President, Dr. Alex Ekwueme, Governor of Akwa Ibom, Godswill Akpabio, Governor of Niger, Dr. Babangida Aliyu, Governor of Enugu, Sullivan Chime, Governor of Jigawa, Sule Lamido, Governor of Bayelsa, Timipre Silva, Governor of Adamawa, Murtala Nyako, Governor of Katsina, Ibrahim Shema, Governor of Imo, Chief Ikedi Ohakim, Governor of Ogun, Gbenga Daniel, Governor of Rivers, Rotimi Amaechi, Governor of Nasarawa, Akwe Doma, Deputy Governor of Plateau,  Paulin Talen, Governor of Osun, Olagunsoye Oyinlola, Governor of Ekiti, Olusegun Oni, Governor of Delta, Emmanuel Uduaghan, Governor of Bauchi, Isa Yuguda, Governor of Gombe, Danjuma Goje, Governor of Kwara, Bukola Saraki, Governor of Cross River, Lyel Imoke, Governor of Benue, Gabriel Suswan, Governor of Kebbi, Saidu Dakingari, Governor of Zamfara, Aliu Shinkafi.
Senators Annie Okonkwo, Lee Maeba, Osita Isunazo, Nicholas Yahaya Ugbane.

Samuel Ogbemudia, Chief Ebenezer Babatope, Professor Jerry Gana, Adamu Hassan, Senator Walid Jibrin, Senator Stella Omu,  Major-General Mohammadu Magoro (retd),  Senator Abubakar Sodangi, Shuaibu Oyedokun,  Nana Aisha Kadiri,  Yekini Adeojo, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu, Kassim Ibrahim Imam,  Hajia Hauwa Kida, Mrs Christy Silas,  Hajia Rabi Murktar Mohammed,  Garba Matazu,  Farouk Lawal, Ataii Idoko.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Nigeria: Collapsed building, accident claim 12 lives in Abuja

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 47 Second

35 trapped •NEMA urges people to stay away from uncompleted building

 No fewer than 12 people lost their lives in two incidents involving a collapsed three- storey building at Ikolie Street, Area 11 and an auto accident involving a trailer that crashed into about 14 vehicles at A.Y.A Junction, Asokoro District, Abuja, yesterday.

About 40 squatters were said to be residing in the uncompleted building when it collapsed around 5 a.m., trapping the occupants who included women and children.

Five persons, including a pregnant woman who later died from injuries from the concrete beam that fell on her, were initially rescued from the building around 10 am.

As at 2.30 pm, about 14 people had been brought out from the building and taken to the National Hospital for medical attention.

The structure, which collapsed at precisely 5:03 yesterday morning, is the third building to crumble in the territory since January. Seven people were rescued alive while about 35 persons, including children, were  trapped.

A combined team of the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), Nigerian Civil Defence and Security Corps (NCDSC), Nigerian Police, Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs), Julius Berger Construction Company, National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and some foreign missions were involved in the rescue operations.

The building, a hotel, was said to have been under construction since 2001 and was later marked for demolition by the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) owing to the owner’s failure to meet required specifications. He was alleged to have added an additional structure making it a four-storey building as against the specified three-storey building which consequently collapsed the structure.

The owner was alleged to have challenged the matter in court  which lingered until the incident occurred.

One of the survivors, David Ibrahim, said his younger brother, alerted him  yesterday morning that there were vibrations around the building. On getting to the balcony of the second floor where they lived, they noticed that half of the structure was already giving way, prompting them to jump to the ground and safety.

Bruised all over, David said so many of their neighbours, mainly artisans and illegal occupants, were still trapped.

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Bala Mohammed, condemned the incident and said the full weight of the law would be brought to bear on those that erected the structure.

NEMA boss, Dr. Charles Agbo, while regretting the unfortunate incident advised on the need for all the relevant agencies including the police, FCDA, to ensure that construction sites and uncompleted buildings do not become places of habitation for illegal occupants since these could harbor all sorts of criminals.

The agency in statement signed by the Chief Press Secretary, Mr.  Segun Imohiosen, said NEMA working jointly with other rescue personnel have been able to  rescue about ten people including a twelve year old boy from the rubbles on the collapsed structure.

“We have been able to  rescue about ten people including a twelve year old boy. These ten people are alive but other three people were brought out dead”, he said.

He said NEMA in collaboration with other disaster management agencies undertook a search and rescue operations at a collapsed building site yesterday morning as soon as the alert on the incident was brought to its notice

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Nigerian Politicians are stockpiling arms, Rivers alleges

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 28 Second

Delta PDP exco is intact’
Party faithful threaten suit in Plateau

THE Rivers State government has alleged a large scale importation of arms into the state by some persons for the purpose of determining the outcome of next year’s election. It has also accused some top politicians in the state of sponsoring miscreants to destabilise it.
Meanwhile, the Uduaghan 2011 Campaign Organisation yesterday denied reports of the dissolution of the Delta State branch of the PDP by the National Working Committee of the party.
The group’s Director of Public Affairs, Chike Ogeah, who stated this in Asaba, insisted that there was no reason whatsoever to sack the Chief Peter Nwaoboshi-led executive. Ogeah said the sack report was a figment of the imagination of the writer.
“For the avoidance of doubt, the PDP NWC has met and validated the Delta State exco,” he said. Ogeah urged Governor Uduaghan’s supporters and the party’s faithful to discountenance the publication. But the crisis in the Plateau State PDP may have deepened as the Prof. Dakum Shown-led faction yesterday threatened to sue the party’s National Working Committee (NWC) for extending the tenure of the Caretaker Committee which it put in place last year.  The Plateau State High Court had on April 23, 2010 declared the caretaker committee “illegal, unconstitutional, null and void” and consequently ordered the reinstatement of the Shown-led State Executive Council (SEC). But rather than comply with this order, the national leadership of the party yesterday announced the extension of the caretaker committee.
Piqued by this development, which it described as an “affront to the court and the rule of law,” the Shown-led SEC has written to the PDP National Chairman, Okwesilieze Nwodo, asking him to rescind its decision to extend the “illegal” Caretaker Committee’s tenure which the then Vincent Ogbulafor committee set up on August 18, 2009 or be cited for contempt of court.  Secretary to the Rivers State Government (SSG), Magnus Abe, made the allegations while explaining why security operatives arrested and arraigned some factional members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in a Port Harcourt Magistrate Court.
Abe told reporters yesterday that the government had uncovered huge importation of arms into the state and briefed the police authorities.
According to him, though the government has always encouraged the politics of dissent, it would not condone any act that could breach the peace of the state.
Abe alleged that the group of persons who were arrested by security agents while trying to inaugurate a parallel PDP executive council  were being sponsored by some top Rivers’ politicians (names withheld).  
However, he stressed that the government cannot in good conscience allow anybody regardless of his status to operate outside the law.
Abe argued that one of the persons arraigned in court was once rusticated from the Rivers State University of Science and Technology for secret cult activities.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Nigeria: August meeting with the fiirst Lady of Nigeria, Dame Patience Goodluck Ebele Jonathan

0 0
Read Time:7 Minute, 47 Second
Anambra State was agog with the visit of the first Lady of Nigeria, Dame Patience Goodluck Ebele Jonathan during her two days official visit to the state from 21 – 22 July, 2010. It was completely women affair and even the governor, his deputy and male commissioners and legislators looked out of place. Why? Could they dance like the women? Of course they could not. You need to see the women in their best and different colours in different columns. Those in red occupied a particular position that made it look all red, then those in blue, then green and others, all beautifully dressed. It was a gathering of women of timbre and caliber, all dancing joyously to the live band that reeled out beautiful tunes as long as the occasion lasted. Numerous activities marked this august visit, including the commissioning of certain projects by the First Lady and her meeting with the traditional rulers of the state. All this might not have interested the women more than the flag-off of the 2010 August Meeting by the First Lady.

The August Meeting has assumed a position of prominence in Nigeria that the First Lady had to flag it off in Anambra State. Any reason could have been given why it had to be in Anambra with such a joyous and tumultuous celebration. The origin of the August Meeting in its present form is not very clear. However it can be categorically stated that this annual phenomenon that brings the womenfolk together cannot be wished away. In fact, it is one of the things which only the women can do better than the men. Naturally, women seem to be more gregarious than men and they respect their leaders more. Men are more independent and seem to calculate their value more by what they have and what they are. They more often than not see their leaders as competitors and this often results in opposition. The men leaders who are poor seem to shrink before the rich men. This belief of men in wealth comes out in the words of an illiterate politician who was quoted to have said that, “My opponent has money and I has money too”. This is not so with the women. Any woman who challenges the authority of the women leaders does so at her own perdition, no matter how highly placed she may be. The toughness of women is seen in their leadership.

Initially, the August Meeting used to be associated with the main stream churches. But the story has so much changed these days as almost all the denominations do not want to be left out and their women organizations stand out in various activities. Today, one can see different uniforms with different names and insignia of different denominations all over the place once it is the time for the August Meeting. Also, some denominations, whose members, hitherto, did not join in the village meetings now think otherwise. Such notion that those who attend such gatherings are ‘sinners’ or that they ‘belong to the world’ seems to be dying out fast. In the women’s village meetings of today, almost all the women, irrespective of denomination or religion now come together to discuss for the good and future of their various communities. Whether one believes it or not, their decisions influence those of their husbands.

In the Catholic Church, the emphasis during the August Meeting is always on the emulation of the praiseworthy qualities of the Blessed Virgin Mary. This could have accounted for why all other fashion except the normal CWO uniform is prohibited during the August Meeting. The uniform simply consists of the CWO-crested blue wrapper with a simple white blouse sewn in a particular design. It has to be noted that the blue colour is usually attributed to the Blessed Virgin Mary. Recently, this uniformity was extended to the necklace which now appears as blue and white beads with a blue medal. Another reason for these restrictions is the proclivity of women to show off. In fact, it is in the nature of the women to seek to be noticed and this may lead to the intimidation of the poor ones with very costly materials by the rich ones. The type of foot wears worn this time cannot be controlled. If not, the women would have done that also. So, two things that still separate the rich women from the others are the costly foot wears they put on and the rich colour of their new wrappers. The poor women’s wrappers have seen more days and they are bleached by time and hardship. Their blouses also sit between white and brown.

Though the August Meeting is normally punctuated with paper presentations on diverse spiritual topics, it largely offers the women the opportunity to meet with each other and discuss on sundry issues which include the welfare of the women, their families, the society and the Church. The women who have not been home for long see in the August Meeting the opportunity to interact with the home-based women and eat the local foods like boiled corn, okpa, akara etc. These are readily made available by some experts among the women. Some family issues, especially matrimonial cases are treated in the August Meeting. That is when one hears of stories of some mothers-in-law maltreating their daughters-in-law or the daughters-in-law maltreating mothers-in-law. Also cases like husband-snatching and wife-battery are also treated. Then, simple family squabbles and exchange of words are also treated. Sometimes it is made in such a way that any case that comes out before the women must have some sort of fine attached to it both from the accused and accuser. This is to make sure that only issues of importance are presented before the women.

Occasionally, in both the village and church August meetings, one witnesses a horrible scenario of power tussle and deleterious politics. Some politically-minded women believe that the leadership of women in the church gives them the opportunity of actualizing their secular political ambition. They form cliques to undermine the powers of the incumbent leaders in order to capture power easily. They hoodwink the unsuspecting ones among them to sing their praises and lead the battle. It is said that there is no extent these ambitious women cannot go for this. Sometimes, it is said to assume the form of political campaigns where gift items are distributed to attract followership. Such women are also known to make some dubious movements from house to house at dusk to get supporters. This is mild. In serious cases, it is said that some go as far as visiting the native doctors to acquire power. A story was told of how the dreaded Bakassi Boys killed a woman who was going to the August Meeting with charms to make the women follow her sheepishly. This may not be true. But it shows the extent some of our women can go to rule their fellow women. That is the August Meeting on the other side.

It must be noted that the August Meeting has helped the women in supporting the church in an appreciable way. The women task themselves and contribute to put up some structures in the church. That is why their much emphasis on money is sometimes ignored by the church authorities because no other group can do it the way they do. Some politicians find this as a great opportunity to come closer to the women by donating ‘generously’ to them in anticipation of their support in the next election. The women in turn give such politicians some bogus titles and awards. And money flows. But this does not mean that all the monies gathered are used for the exact purposes for which they were contributed. There is an allegation that in spite of the large sums expended on some of their projects, they remain unfinished for many years. It is also said that large sums are spent on the maintenance of the women leaders. This, they say, accounts for some manipulations during the elections and why some refuse to leave office.  However, some of the women leaders are role models and they are simply wonderful.

The August Meeting has become a great event among the womenfolk. As things stand now, it will not be surprising if it is flagged off by the president himself next year. It deserves such recognition and this is a serious warning signal to the men. My fear is that if God decides that the second-coming be in August, only the women may be taken up and the men may be left behind. The men must wake up to their duties in the church and organize themselves better. It is sad that many men do not even know the response to their slogan, “Ndi Nna Paapa!” and some of their uniforms are mere copies of the women’s.  Even at that, I know that the women cannot belong to their group without being wives and their husbands support them directly or indirectly. But what we talk of is active participation and the women are unequalled there.

Rev. Fr. Clement Muozoba

okochacm@yahoo.com

07060843010

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Xenophobia Is Going To Hurt American Repulicans In Future

0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 45 Second

Christmas came early for demagogues. The court decision putting a hold on the worst provisions of Arizona’s new anti-Latino immigration law is a gift-wrapped present to those who delight in turning truth, justice and the American way into political liabilities.

As surely everyone knows by now, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton issued a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking the state from enforcing parts of the law that look patently unconstitutional. The political fallout is pretty clear: In the short run, at least, Republicans win and Democrats lose.

Longer term, the impact of the immigration issue on the major parties’ prospects is the other way around. But the focus now is on winning in November, and the GOP is licking its chops.

Critics have another weapon to use against the Obama administration, because it was President Obama’s Justice Department that filed suit against the Arizona law. Attorney General Eric Holder chose a relatively narrow argument: that the draconian measure was a blatant usurpation of the federal government’s prerogative to establish and enforce immigration laws.

Bolton agreed, and she enjoined the parts of the measure that ventured onto federal turf. The Justice Department did not ask her to address the other big problem with the law, which is that it amounts to a prescription for racial profiling on a scale not seen in this country since the days of Jim Crow laws in the South. But Bolton went there anyway.

If local police are ordered to verify the immigration status of anyone they detain or question, there is a “substantial likelihood” that such an indiscriminate dragnet will sweep up legal resident aliens, foreign tourists with valid visas, and even U.S. citizens — in other words, anyone who looks kind of Mexican.

Sheriffs’ Nightmare?

Aside from Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio — a grandstanding publicity hound who already stages immigration raids for the television cameras — virtually all prominent law enforcement officials in the state opposed the law. They argued that it would overburden their resources, potentially put their officers in danger and, most importantly, make it much harder to investigate crimes.

Imagine two men in a car who happen to be waiting at a stoplight when a brutal mugging takes place before their eyes. If the new law were in effect, and if one of those witnesses were here illegally, what are the odds that they’d stick around to tell police what they saw?

We’ll hear no such subtlety or nuance from Republicans this fall, though. We’ll hear thunderous allegations that the Obama administration — the big, bad federal government — conspired with an unelected federal judge to keep the state of Arizona from enforcing a law that seeks only to kick out of the country a bunch of people who have no right to be here.

We’ll hear from GOP candidates that Arizona had to act because the federal government refuses to “secure the border.” The fact is that President Obama has sharply increased border enforcement and deportations; the influx of undocumented immigrants is greatly reduced from what it was during the Bush administration.

Sound-Bite Politics

But there Obama goes again, trying to find a sane, moderate course of action. Predictably, he’s getting hit from both sides — the anti-immigrant crowd that claims he’s not doing enough, and the pro-immigrant crowd that complains he’s doing too much.

Immigration wasn’t always a partisan issue, but that’s what it has become; even John McCain, once a strong advocate of comprehensive reform, now sides with the xenophobes.

This is a huge long-term problem for Republicans, who risk becoming branded as the anti-Latino party — and driving the nation’s biggest and fastest-growing minority group into the arms of the Democratic Party for a generation or more.

Smart GOP strategists such as Karl Rove understand this danger and have sounded warnings. But their voices are drowned out by those who demand that authorities somehow track down, apprehend and expel the estimated 12 million people here without documents, the vast majority of whom are law-abiding and productive.

Anything short of an all-out pogrom is labeled “amnesty” — the kind of craven surrender favored by such liberal bleeding-hearts as Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.

“No to illegal immigration” is a simple sound bite that will win votes for some Republican candidates. Democrats find themselves stuck with words that work better as a movie title than as a campaign slogan: “Do the right thing.”

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %

Chelsea Clinton’s wedding: An instant guide

0 0
Read Time:6 Minute, 35 Second

Bill and Hillary’s only child is getting wed (for real, this time). Here’s what’s known about the feverishly anticipated ceremony

Neither Chelsea Clinton nor her fiancé, Marc Mezvinsky, are speaking publicly about their plans to wed this weekend, and Chelsea’s tabloid-savvy parents have offered few clues. Yet, America being America, the internet has been abuzz with questions and rumors about Chelsea’s upcoming nuptials — and the first glimpse of her “sizable” engagement ring on April 25 (not to mention reports that Bill’s dieting) have only fueled the speculation. Here’s what’s been reported to date:

 When is the wedding?
This Saturday, July 31, according to multiple sources.

Where will the nuptials take place?
According the Hudson Valley News, the wedding will take place under a tent at the former estate of John Jacob Astor IV in Rhinebeck, N.Y. The mansion dates back to 1902 and boasts an indoor tennis court and white marble swimming pool, according to a release. The property is now owned by Kathleen Hammer, a contributor to Hillary Clinton’s presidential and Senate bids. Although the delivery of wedding gifts there last week and the building of tents there last weekend all but confirmed it as the location, the rumors were verified by the arrival of former president Bill Clinton in Rhinebeck on Friday.

Who’s catering the affair? What about flowers?
The catering job will be shared by Blue Ribbon Restaurants, St. Regis Hotels and Resorts, and Olivier Cheng Catering and Events, according to a Wall Street Journal source. “Chelsea is a vegan. The food will include vegetarian, vegan, and gluten-free dishes, but there will also be grass-fed organic beef on the menu,” according to a source in Life & Style magazine, as quoted in Ecorazzi. It’ll reportedly be gluten-free complete with a vegan wedding cake. Both Boston-based Winston Flowers and Four Seasons Hotels’ floral designer Jeff Leatham will be contributing blooms.

Sounds expensive.
It is. ABC News estimates the total cost for the affair could reach $2 million, and other reports say that it could cost as much as $5 million. The flowers alone could cost $250,000. (Watch a CNN report about the wedding costs)

Hold on. Didn’t Chelsea already get married last August?
No. The persistent, decidedly false wedding rumors that flooded the media last summer (and also centered on Martha’s Vineyard) drove the Clintons to distraction. As The New York Times reported, “It got to the point where spokesmen for the Clintons even offered to bet any journalist’s source $1,000 that there would be no wedding (a wager no one took).”

Who’s the lucky groom?
Marc Mezvinsky, 32, is a Goldman Sachs banker (a Private Wealth Management associate, according to a listing in the Spoke directory). He’s known Chelsea since their teens. They met in Washington, D.C., and both went on to attend Stanford University. Mezvinsky is the son of two former congressmembers.

What’s Bill Clinton think about his future son-in-law?
He seems sanguine: “My daughter is happy. I like and admire my future son-in-law, so I couldn’t be happier about it,” he told CNN’s Candy Crowley in a January interview.

Is Bill helping mastermind the nuptials?
Yes, to a limited degree. Though Clinton told Ryan Seacrest in March that his role was limited to walking Chelsea down the aisle “and [paying] the bills,” as of April 19, he was telling NBC that his daughter had opted to tap his world-leader expertise: “Chelsea has been good enough to include me in the decisions…so I love that.” Still, Bill is making sure to keep the focus on the bride. “I am going to try not to cry because this isn’t about me, it’s about her. And if I am crying then it becomes partly about me and I don’t even want to be mentioned in the story except that I didn’t stumble walking down the aisle. So I am going to try but I may not be able to do it,” he said at June’s Fortune/Time/CNN global forum.

How have Chelsea’s parents been dealing otherwise?
As of April, Chelsea had put her father on a diet to shed 15 pounds and ensure he “looks good,” according to the New York Post. As for Hillary, when CNN’s Crowley asked her which is harder — negotiating Middle East peace or planning this wedding — Hillary replied with a smile, “Well, I’d probably call it a draw.”

Will the Clintons’ political supporters be present?
Only those who are also close personal friends, reports New York. With the invite list limited to 500 names, Chelsea has apparently “instituted a strict no-strangers policy: She must personally know every invitee.” Two people who definitely won’t attend? Al and Tipper Gore. “The Gores are not attending the wedding,” a spokeswoman said in a statement, quoted in the New York Daily News.

What celebrities will be attending?
Reports say
that Oprah Winfrey, Barbra Streisand, Steven Spielberg, and Ted Turner are among the 500 guests. Originally, it was believed that President Obama would attend, but he reveals he wasn’t invited. Also attending will be various members of the Clinton “inner circle,” including former British Prime Minister John Major, former deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes, former DNC chairman Terry McAuliffe, historian Doris Kearns Goodwin, and Democratic donor Denise Rich.

Are there photos of the engagement ring online?
Only a few members of Chelsea’s inner circle had seen the ring until April 25, when she flashed her “sizable diamond ring” at the opening night of Broadway’s “Promises, Promises.” The media duly disseminated photos of the bejeweled bride-to-be on crutches.

Crutches? What happened?
Chelsea broke her heel, claiming she has no idea how it happened; a source tells People that she’ll recover in time for her wedding.

Who designed Chelsea’s dress?
It’s a debate. “If family ties have anything to do with it, then all signs point to Oscar de la Renta,” says Jessica Flint in Vanity Fair. He’s Hillary’s favorite, and also a close personal friend of the Clintons. However, reports in June indicated that Chelsea may have selected a Vera Wang dress instead.

What did Hillary Clinton wear on her 1975 wedding day?
“A beige muslin-y, linen Jessica McClintock number” that Hillary bought off the rack at Dillard’s the day before her wedding, according to VF‘s Flint.

Will the ceremony be religious?
This is apparently a matter of debate. While Hillary is Methodist, Bill is Southern Baptist. Yet there’s Mezvinsky’s Jewish faith to consider. “The bride and groom have a range of choices, including conversion or a melding of their two traditions into one ceremony,” reports the Associated Press. After all, Chelsea was spotted last year attending Yom Kippur services with Mezvinsky in New York.

Has there been any fallout over the high-profile event?
Yes. A Brooklyn teacher is angry because her wedding coincides with the date and location of Chelsea’s wedding, making for traffic woes and security fears in the small town. “I know she’s not doing it on purpose,” Emm Haddad-Friedman told Yahoo’s Shine blog. “But Chelsea Clinton has taken what was supposed to be a special day for me and turned it into hell.” Security has already proven a problem as two Norweigan journalists were arrested and charged with trespassing for snapping photos at the estate’s gate. As a measure to ward off paparazzi photographers, Federal authorities ordered the closure of airspace over the estate this weekend.

Sources: CNN (2), The New York Times, Huffington Post, People (2), New York Post (2), Vanity Fair, Associated Press (2) (3), New York, Styleite, CBS, New York Daily News, Newser, Wall Street Journal, Radar Online, ABC News (2), Yahoo! Shine, Hudson Valley News, Ecorazzi, AFP, The Hill

Note: This story, originally published on April 27, 2010, was updated on July 30.

About Post Author

Anthony-Claret Ifeanyi Onwutalobi

Anthony-Claret is a software Engineer, entrepreneur and the founder of Codewit INC. Mr. Claret publishes and manages the content on Codewit Word News website and associated websites. He's a writer, IT Expert, great administrator, technology enthusiast, social media lover and all around digital guy.
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
0 0 %